Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-660 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760
VS
The verdict
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 3.30 pp more efficient. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 10 differencesHow alike are they
9
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
10 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
DEG21C.20-660
NEG21C.20Q-760
Difference
Module efficiency
21.20 %
24.50 %
3.30 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.340 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.080 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
660 Wp
760 Wp
100 W more power
Power density
212.5 Wp/m²
244.7 Wp/m²
32.2 Wp/m² higher
Weight per kWp
58.0 kg/kWp
50.4 kg/kWp
7.6 kg/kWp lighter
Annual degradation
0.45 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
0.10 %/yr slower
Open-circuit voltage
45.90 V
50.90 V
5.00 V apart
Cell technology
PERC
TOPCon
PERC vs TOPCon
Voltage at max power
38.10 V
42.90 V
4.80 V apart
Cell count
132
264
132 cells apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
DEG21C.20-660
21,734 kWh
NEG21C.20Q-760
25,698 kWh
Lifetime gap
3,964 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
DEG21C.20-660
NEG21C.20Q-760
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
660 W
760 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.9% of rated power
626 W
730 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.8% of rated power
593 W
701 W
Hot roof
70 °C
84.7% of rated power
559 W
671 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
DEG21C.20-660
NEG21C.20Q-760
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
660 Wp
760 Wp
+100 W for NEG21C.20Q-760
Module efficiency
21.20 %
24.50 %
+3.30 pp for NEG21C.20Q-760
Power density
212.5 Wp/m²
244.7 Wp/m²
+32.2 Wp/m² for NEG21C.20Q-760
Open-circuit voltage
45.90 V
50.90 V
5.00 V apart
Voltage at max power
38.10 V
42.90 V
4.80 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.45 A
18.85 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
17.35 A
17.72 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.340 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.080 %/°C for NEG21C.20Q-760
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
Same
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
38.3 kg
38.3 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
58.0 kg/kWp
50.4 kg/kWp
-7.6 kg/kWp for NEG21C.20Q-760
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.45 %/yr
0.35 %/yr
-0.10 %/yr for NEG21C.20Q-760
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
TOPCon
PERC vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
264
132 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#9,076
vs
#74
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 9,002 places
Power density
#8,959
vs
#86
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 8,873 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778
vs
#511
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 8,267 places
Weight
#11,529
vs
#3,780
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 7,749 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,228
vs
#66
NEG21C.20Q-760 leads by 3,162 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-660 vs Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-665
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-660 vs Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-655
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-660 vs Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-650
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-660 vs Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-645
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-660 or Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760?
According to our database: Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 has higher module efficiency (24.50% vs 21.20%); Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-660 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760?
Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-660 has a module efficiency of 21.20%, while Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 is 24.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-660 use vs Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760?
Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-660 uses PERC cells; Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-660 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760?
Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-660 has a 30 years power warranty; Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-660 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 bifacial panels?
Both Trina Solar TSM-DEG21C.20-660 and Trina Solar TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 242 Trina Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

