Skip to main content
TWMNH-66HD610 vs TWMHF-66HD740X 5 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 vs Tongwei TWMHF-66HD740X

TWMNH-66HD610
610 Wp 22.60 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
TWMHF-66HD740X
740 Wp 23.80 % N-type Bifacial
The verdict

TWMHF-66HD740X leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.20 pp more efficient. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 14 differences
How alike are they
5 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

14 of 19 parameters
Parameter TWMNH-66HD610 TWMHF-66HD740X Difference
Module efficiency 22.60 % 23.80 % 1.20 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.240 %/°C 0.040 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 610 Wp 740 Wp 130 W more power
Power density 225.8 Wp/m² 238.2 Wp/m² 12.4 Wp/m² higher
Weight 32.5 kg 37.0 kg 4.5 kg lighter
Product warranty 12 yrs 15 yrs 3 yrs longer
Short-circuit current 15.94 A 18.47 A 2.53 A apart
Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart
Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type
Weight per kWp 53.3 kg/kWp 50.0 kg/kWp 3.3 kg/kWp lighter
Current at max power 15.07 A 17.49 A 2.42 A apart
Open-circuit voltage 48.70 V 50.62 V 1.92 V apart
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Voltage at max power 40.48 V 42.32 V 1.84 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
TWMNH-66HD610
20,467 kWh
TWMHF-66HD740X
24,925 kWh
Lifetime gap
4,458 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario TWMNH-66HD610 TWMHF-66HD740X
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 610 W 740 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 584 W 713 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 559 W 687 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 533 W 660 W
03

Full specification

Parameter TWMNH-66HD610 TWMHF-66HD740X Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 610 Wp 740 Wp +130 W for TWMHF-66HD740X
Module efficiency 22.60 % 23.80 % +1.20 pp for TWMHF-66HD740X
Power density 225.8 Wp/m² 238.2 Wp/m² +12.4 Wp/m² for TWMHF-66HD740X
Open-circuit voltage 48.70 V 50.62 V 1.92 V apart
Voltage at max power 40.48 V 42.32 V 1.84 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.94 A 18.47 A 2.53 A apart
Current at max power 15.07 A 17.49 A 2.42 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.240 %/°C +0.040 %/°C for TWMHF-66HD740X
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart
Weight 32.5 kg 37.0 kg -4.5 kg for TWMNH-66HD610
Weight per kWp 53.3 kg/kWp 50.0 kg/kWp -3.3 kg/kWp for TWMHF-66HD740X
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 15 yrs +3 yrs for TWMHF-66HD740X
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.38 %/yr Effectively the same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#3,658 vs #433
TWMHF-66HD740X leads by 3,225 places
Power density
#3,729 vs #431
TWMHF-66HD740X leads by 3,298 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #13
TWMHF-66HD740X leads by 1,296 places
Weight
#7,135 vs #3,317
TWMHF-66HD740X leads by 3,818 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,278 vs #130
TWMHF-66HD740X leads by 3,148 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD750
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD745
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD740
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD735
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 vs Tongwei TWMHF-66HD735X
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 vs Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 or Tongwei TWMHF-66HD740X?
According to our database: Tongwei TWMHF-66HD740X has higher module efficiency (23.80% vs 22.60%); Tongwei TWMHF-66HD740X tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.280%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 and Tongwei TWMHF-66HD740X?
Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 has a module efficiency of 22.60%, while Tongwei TWMHF-66HD740X is 23.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 use vs Tongwei TWMHF-66HD740X?
Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 uses TOPCon cells; Tongwei TWMHF-66HD740X uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 and Tongwei TWMHF-66HD740X?
Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 has a 30 years power warranty; Tongwei TWMHF-66HD740X has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 and Tongwei TWMHF-66HD740X bifacial panels?
Both Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 and Tongwei TWMHF-66HD740X are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 70 Tongwei offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.