Skip to main content
TWMNH-66HD610 vs TWMHF-66HD730X 5 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 vs Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X

TWMNH-66HD610
610 Wp 22.60 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
TWMHF-66HD730X
730 Wp 23.50 % N-type Bifacial
The verdict

TWMHF-66HD730X leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.90 pp more efficient. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 14 differences
How alike are they
5 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

14 of 19 parameters
Parameter TWMNH-66HD610 TWMHF-66HD730X Difference
Module efficiency 22.60 % 23.50 % 0.90 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.240 %/°C 0.040 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 610 Wp 730 Wp 120 W more power
Power density 225.8 Wp/m² 235.0 Wp/m² 9.2 Wp/m² higher
Weight 32.5 kg 37.0 kg 4.5 kg lighter
Product warranty 12 yrs 15 yrs 3 yrs longer
Short-circuit current 15.94 A 18.28 A 2.34 A apart
Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart
Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type
Current at max power 15.07 A 17.33 A 2.26 A apart
Weight per kWp 53.3 kg/kWp 50.7 kg/kWp 2.6 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 48.70 V 50.46 V 1.76 V apart
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Voltage at max power 40.48 V 42.13 V 1.65 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
TWMNH-66HD610
20,467 kWh
TWMHF-66HD730X
24,588 kWh
Lifetime gap
4,121 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario TWMNH-66HD610 TWMHF-66HD730X
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 610 W 730 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 584 W 704 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 559 W 677 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 533 W 651 W
03

Full specification

Parameter TWMNH-66HD610 TWMHF-66HD730X Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 610 Wp 730 Wp +120 W for TWMHF-66HD730X
Module efficiency 22.60 % 23.50 % +0.90 pp for TWMHF-66HD730X
Power density 225.8 Wp/m² 235.0 Wp/m² +9.2 Wp/m² for TWMHF-66HD730X
Open-circuit voltage 48.70 V 50.46 V 1.76 V apart
Voltage at max power 40.48 V 42.13 V 1.65 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.94 A 18.28 A 2.34 A apart
Current at max power 15.07 A 17.33 A 2.26 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.240 %/°C +0.040 %/°C for TWMHF-66HD730X
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2382x1134x30 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 2.701 m² 3.106 m² 0.405 m² apart
Weight 32.5 kg 37.0 kg -4.5 kg for TWMNH-66HD610
Weight per kWp 53.3 kg/kWp 50.7 kg/kWp -2.6 kg/kWp for TWMHF-66HD730X
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 15 yrs +3 yrs for TWMHF-66HD730X
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.38 %/yr Effectively the same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon N-type TOPCon vs N-type
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#3,658 vs #716
TWMHF-66HD730X leads by 2,942 places
Power density
#3,729 vs #800
TWMHF-66HD730X leads by 2,929 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #13
TWMHF-66HD730X leads by 1,296 places
Weight
#7,135 vs #4,111
TWMHF-66HD730X leads by 3,024 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,278 vs #196
TWMHF-66HD730X leads by 3,082 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD750
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD745
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD740
11 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 vs Tongwei TWMHF-66HD740X
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 vs Tongwei TWMNF-66HD735
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 vs Tongwei TWMHF-66HD735X
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 or Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X?
According to our database: Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 22.60%); Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.280%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 and Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X?
Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 has a module efficiency of 22.60%, while Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 use vs Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X?
Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 uses TOPCon cells; Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 and Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X?
Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 has a 30 years power warranty; Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 and Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X bifacial panels?
Both Tongwei TWMNH-66HD610 and Tongwei TWMHF-66HD730X are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 70 Tongwei offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.