Skip to main content
TP550HG10TB vs TP540HG10B-530 10 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB vs Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-530

Tata Power Solar
TP550HG10TB
550 Wp 21.29 % PERC Bifacial
VS
Tata Power Solar
TP540HG10B-530
530 Wp 20.52 % PERC Bifacial
The verdict

TP550HG10TB leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.77 pp more efficient. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
10 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

9 of 19 parameters
Parameter TP550HG10TB TP540HG10B-530 Difference
Module efficiency 21.29 % 20.52 % 0.77 pp more efficient
Performance warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs 5 yrs longer
Weight 29.0 kg 33.0 kg 4.0 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 52.7 kg/kWp 62.3 kg/kWp 9.5 kg/kWp lighter
Power density 212.9 Wp/m² 205.2 Wp/m² 7.7 Wp/m² higher
Annual degradation 0.72 %/yr 0.60 %/yr 0.12 %/yr slower
Rated power 550 Wp 530 Wp 20 W more power
Product warranty 10 yrs 12 yrs 2 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient -0.360 %/°C -0.370 %/°C 0.010 %/°C better in heat
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
TP550HG10TB
17,238 kWh
TP540HG10B-530
16,943 kWh
Lifetime gap
295 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario TP550HG10TB TP540HG10B-530
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 550 W 530 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.5% of rated power 520 W 501 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 88.9% of rated power 491 W 471 W
Hot roof 70 °C 83.3% of rated power 461 W 442 W
03

Full specification

Parameter TP550HG10TB TP540HG10B-530 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 550 Wp 530 Wp +20 W for TP550HG10TB
Module efficiency 21.29 % 20.52 % +0.77 pp for TP550HG10TB
Power density 212.9 Wp/m² 205.2 Wp/m² +7.7 Wp/m² for TP550HG10TB
Open-circuit voltage 49.75 V 49.30 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 42.62 V 42.20 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.42 A 13.13 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 12.90 A 12.56 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.360 %/°C -0.370 %/°C +0.010 %/°C for TP550HG10TB
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x35 mm 2278x1134x35 mm Same
Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same
Weight 29.0 kg 33.0 kg -4.0 kg for TP550HG10TB
Weight per kWp 52.7 kg/kWp 62.3 kg/kWp -9.5 kg/kWp for TP550HG10TB
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 10 yrs 12 yrs +2 yrs for TP540HG10B-530
Performance warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs +5 yrs for TP540HG10B-530
Annual degradation 0.72 %/yr 0.60 %/yr -0.12 %/yr for TP540HG10B-530
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#8,708 vs #11,244
TP550HG10TB leads by 2,536 places
Power density
#8,497 vs #11,255
TP550HG10TB leads by 2,758 places
Heat behaviour
#12,345 vs #13,081
TP550HG10TB leads by 736 places
Weight
#6,373 vs #12,757
TP550HG10TB leads by 6,384 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #21
TP540HG10B-530 leads by 9,777 places
Overall
#8,571 vs #8,798
TP550HG10TB leads by 227 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Tata Power Solar
Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB vs Tata Power Solar TP545HG10TB
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Tata Power Solar
Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB vs Tata Power Solar TP540HG10TB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tata Power Solar
Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB vs Tata Power Solar TP535HG10TB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tata Power Solar
Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB vs Tata Power Solar TP530HG10TB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tata Power Solar
Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-530 vs Tata Power Solar TP590LG10B
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Tata Power Solar
Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-530 vs Tata Power Solar TP580LG10B
9 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB or Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-530?
According to our database: Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB has higher module efficiency (21.29% vs 20.52%); Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.360%/°C vs -0.370%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB and Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-530?
Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB has a module efficiency of 21.29%, while Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-530 is 20.52%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB use vs Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-530?
Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB uses PERC cells; Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-530 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB and Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-530?
Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB has a 25 years power warranty; Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-530 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB and Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-530 bifacial panels?
Both Tata Power Solar TP550HG10TB and Tata Power Solar TP540HG10B-530 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.