Skip to main content
DXM10-48H 475W vs DXM8-72HBG 600W 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W

Sun Earth
DXM10-48H 475W
475 Wp 23.80 % TOPCon
VS
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W
Sun Earth
DXM8-72HBG 600W
600 Wp 23.20 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

DXM10-48H 475W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 125 W more power. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter DXM10-48H 475W DXM8-72HBG 600W Difference
Rated power 475 Wp 600 Wp 125 W more power
Module efficiency 23.80 % 23.20 % 0.60 pp more efficient
Weight 21.0 kg 32.0 kg 11.0 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 44.2 kg/kWp 53.3 kg/kWp 9.1 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 36.88 V 52.10 V 15.22 V apart
Module area 1.998 m² 2.583 m² 0.585 m² apart
Power density 237.7 Wp/m² 232.3 Wp/m² 5.5 Wp/m² higher
Short-circuit current 15.94 A 14.64 A 1.30 A apart
Voltage at max power 31.45 V 42.90 V 11.45 V apart
Cell count 96 144 48 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Current at max power 15.11 A 13.99 A 1.12 A apart
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
DXM10-48H 475W
15,937 kWh
DXM8-72HBG 600W
20,131 kWh
Lifetime gap
4,194 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario DXM10-48H 475W DXM8-72HBG 600W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 475 W 600 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 454 W 574 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 434 W 548 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 413 W 522 W
03

Full specification

Parameter DXM10-48H 475W DXM8-72HBG 600W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 475 Wp 600 Wp +125 W for DXM8-72HBG 600W
Module efficiency 23.80 % 23.20 % +0.60 pp for DXM10-48H 475W
Power density 237.7 Wp/m² 232.3 Wp/m² +5.5 Wp/m² for DXM10-48H 475W
Open-circuit voltage 36.88 V 52.10 V 15.22 V apart
Voltage at max power 31.45 V 42.90 V 11.45 V apart
Short-circuit current 15.94 A 14.64 A 1.30 A apart
Current at max power 15.11 A 13.99 A 1.12 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
Module area 1.998 m² 2.583 m² 0.585 m² apart
Weight 21.0 kg 32.0 kg -11.0 kg for DXM10-48H 475W
Weight per kWp 44.2 kg/kWp 53.3 kg/kWp -9.1 kg/kWp for DXM10-48H 475W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 96 144 48 cells apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#433 vs #1,306
DXM10-48H 475W leads by 873 places
Power density
#467 vs #1,252
DXM10-48H 475W leads by 785 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#396 vs #7,236
DXM10-48H 475W leads by 6,840 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,407 vs #2,960
DXM8-72HBG 600W leads by 3,447 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W
12 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 590W
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 580W
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 570W
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W vs Sun Earth DXM8-60HBG 505W
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W or Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W?
According to our database: Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475 W has higher module efficiency (23.80% vs 23.20%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W and Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W?
Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475 W has a module efficiency of 23.80%, while Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600 W is 23.20%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W use vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W?
Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475 W uses TOPCon cells; Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W and Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W?
Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475 W has a 30 years power warranty; Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W and Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W bifacial panels?
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600 W is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 12 Sun Earth offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.