Skip to main content
DXM8-72HBG 600W vs DXM10-48H 475W 6 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W vs Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W

Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W
Sun Earth
DXM8-72HBG 600W
600 Wp 23.20 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Sun Earth
DXM10-48H 475W
475 Wp 23.80 % TOPCon
The verdict

DXM10-48H 475W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 125 W more power. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 13 differences
How alike are they
6 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

13 of 19 parameters
Parameter DXM8-72HBG 600W DXM10-48H 475W Difference
Rated power 600 Wp 475 Wp 125 W more power
Module efficiency 23.20 % 23.80 % 0.60 pp more efficient
Weight 32.0 kg 21.0 kg 11.0 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 53.3 kg/kWp 44.2 kg/kWp 9.1 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 52.10 V 36.88 V 15.22 V apart
Module area 2.583 m² 1.998 m² 0.585 m² apart
Power density 232.3 Wp/m² 237.7 Wp/m² 5.5 Wp/m² higher
Short-circuit current 14.64 A 15.94 A 1.30 A apart
Voltage at max power 42.90 V 31.45 V 11.45 V apart
Cell count 144 96 48 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Current at max power 13.99 A 15.11 A 1.12 A apart
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
DXM8-72HBG 600W
20,131 kWh
DXM10-48H 475W
15,937 kWh
Lifetime gap
4,194 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario DXM8-72HBG 600W DXM10-48H 475W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 600 W 475 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 574 W 454 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 548 W 434 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 522 W 413 W
03

Full specification

Parameter DXM8-72HBG 600W DXM10-48H 475W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 600 Wp 475 Wp +125 W for DXM8-72HBG 600W
Module efficiency 23.20 % 23.80 % +0.60 pp for DXM10-48H 475W
Power density 232.3 Wp/m² 237.7 Wp/m² +5.5 Wp/m² for DXM10-48H 475W
Open-circuit voltage 52.10 V 36.88 V 15.22 V apart
Voltage at max power 42.90 V 31.45 V 11.45 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.64 A 15.94 A 1.30 A apart
Current at max power 13.99 A 15.11 A 1.12 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.583 m² 1.998 m² 0.585 m² apart
Weight 32.0 kg 21.0 kg -11.0 kg for DXM10-48H 475W
Weight per kWp 53.3 kg/kWp 44.2 kg/kWp -9.1 kg/kWp for DXM10-48H 475W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 96 48 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,306 vs #433
DXM10-48H 475W leads by 873 places
Power density
#1,252 vs #467
DXM10-48H 475W leads by 785 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,236 vs #396
DXM10-48H 475W leads by 6,840 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,960 vs #6,407
DXM8-72HBG 600W leads by 3,447 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 610W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 590W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 580W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 570W
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W vs Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 560W
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sun Earth
Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W vs Sun Earth DXM8-60HBG 505W
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W or Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W?
According to our database: Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475 W has higher module efficiency (23.80% vs 23.20%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W and Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W?
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600 W has a module efficiency of 23.20%, while Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475 W is 23.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W use vs Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W?
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600 W uses TOPCon cells; Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W and Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W?
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600 W has a 30 years power warranty; Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600W and Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475W bifacial panels?
Sun Earth DXM8-72HBG 600 W is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Sun Earth DXM10-48H 475 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 11 Sun Earth offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.