SPV560-PM10-144 vs SPV700-TG12-132BD 4 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 vs SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD

Q: Which panel is better: SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 or SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD?

According to our database: SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD has higher module efficiency (22.57% vs 21.69%); SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

Q: What is the efficiency of SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 and SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD?

SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 has a module efficiency of 21.69%, while SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD is 22.57%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

Q: What cell technology does SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 use vs SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD?

SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 uses PERC cells; SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

Q: What is the warranty on SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 and SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD?

SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 has a 30 years power warranty; SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Q: Are SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 and SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD bifacial panels?

SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD is bifacial (captures light from both faces); SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

SpolarPV

SPV560-PM10-144

560 Wp 21.69 % PERC

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

SpolarPV

SPV700-TG12-132BD

700 Wp 22.57 % TOPCon Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

The verdict

SPV700-TG12-132BD leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.88 pp more efficient. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 15 differences

How alike are they

4 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical

identical differs

What actually differs

15 of 19 parameters

Parameter SPV560-PM10-144 SPV700-TG12-132BD Difference

Module efficiency 21.69 % 22.57 % 0.88 pp more efficient

Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.300 %/°C 0.050 %/°C better in heat

Rated power 560 Wp 700 Wp 140 W more power

Weight 26.5 kg 38.0 kg 11.5 kg lighter

Power density 217.0 Wp/m² 225.6 Wp/m² 8.6 Wp/m² higher

Weight per kWp 47.3 kg/kWp 54.3 kg/kWp 7.0 kg/kWp lighter

Short-circuit current 13.82 A 18.35 A 4.53 A apart

Module area 2.581 m² 3.103 m² 0.522 m² apart

Open-circuit voltage 52.05 V 48.25 V 3.80 V apart

Cell technology PERC TOPCon PERC vs TOPCon

Current at max power 13.04 A 17.31 A 4.27 A apart

Cell count 144 132 12 cells apart

Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes

Voltage at max power 42.94 V 40.48 V 2.46 V apart

Dimensions 2278x1133x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm 2278x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Cell temperature

SPV560-PM10-144

18,441 kWh

SPV700-TG12-132BD

23,033 kWh

Lifetime gap

4,592 kWh

Output when it is hot

Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees

Scenario SPV560-PM10-144 SPV700-TG12-132BD

Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 560 W 700 W

Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.8% of rated power 531 W 669 W

Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.5% of rated power 501 W 637 W

Hot roof 70 °C 84.2% of rated power 472 W 606 W

Full specification

Parameter SPV560-PM10-144 SPV700-TG12-132BD Difference

Power and efficiency

Rated power 560 Wp 700 Wp +140 W for SPV700-TG12-132BD

Module efficiency 21.69 % 22.57 % +0.88 pp for SPV700-TG12-132BD

Power density 217.0 Wp/m² 225.6 Wp/m² +8.6 Wp/m² for SPV700-TG12-132BD

Open-circuit voltage 52.05 V 48.25 V 3.80 V apart

Voltage at max power 42.94 V 40.48 V 2.46 V apart

Short-circuit current 13.82 A 18.35 A 4.53 A apart

Current at max power 13.04 A 17.31 A 4.27 A apart

Temperature

Temperature coefficient -0.350 %/°C -0.300 %/°C +0.050 %/°C for SPV700-TG12-132BD

Mechanical

Dimensions 2278x1133x30 mm 2383x1302x30 mm 2278x1133x30 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm

Module area 2.581 m² 3.103 m² 0.522 m² apart

Weight 26.5 kg 38.0 kg -11.5 kg for SPV560-PM10-144

Weight per kWp 47.3 kg/kWp 54.3 kg/kWp -7.0 kg/kWp for SPV560-PM10-144

Warranty and degradation

Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same

Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same

Annual degradation 0.45 %/yr 0.46 %/yr Effectively the same

Technology

Cell technology PERC TOPCon PERC vs TOPCon

Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same

Cell count 144 132 12 cells apart

Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes

Against the whole database

14,005 panels

Efficiency

#7,530 vs #3,882

SPV700-TG12-132BD leads by 3,648 places

Power density

#7,429 vs #3,863

SPV700-TG12-132BD leads by 3,566 places

Heat behaviour

#10,419 vs #6,093

SPV700-TG12-132BD leads by 4,326 places

Weight

#1,639 vs #8,524

SPV560-PM10-144 leads by 6,885 places

Warranty

#21 vs #21

Tied - the same position in the database

Overall

#5,929 vs #1,158

SPV700-TG12-132BD leads by 4,771 places

More useful comparisons

Open the full database

Same series, other bin

SpolarPV

SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 vs SpolarPV SPV555-PM10-144

The same specification on paper

Same series, other bin

SpolarPV

SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 vs SpolarPV SPV550-PM10-144

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

SpolarPV

SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 vs SpolarPV SPV545-PM10-144

4 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

SpolarPV

SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 vs SpolarPV SPV540-PM10-144

4 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

SpolarPV

SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 vs SpolarPV SPV535-PM10-144

6 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

SpolarPV

SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD vs SpolarPV SPV695-TG12-132BD

The same specification on paper

Written summary

Checking cache...

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 or SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD?

According to our database: SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD has higher module efficiency (22.57% vs 21.69%); SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.350%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

What is the efficiency of SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 and SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD?

SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 has a module efficiency of 21.69%, while SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD is 22.57%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

What cell technology does SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 use vs SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD?

SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 uses PERC cells; SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

What is the warranty on SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 and SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD?

SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 has a 30 years power warranty; SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Are SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 and SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD bifacial panels?

SpolarPV SPV700-TG12-132BD is bifacial (captures light from both faces); SpolarPV SPV560-PM10-144 is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.