Solaria SPV665-TG12-132BD vs Solaria PowerXT 430R-PL
VS
The verdict
SPV665-TG12-132BD leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.04 pp more efficient. 3 of 16 comparable parameters are identical, with 3 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish them.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
3
of 16 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
13 of 16 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
SPV665-TG12-132BD
PowerXT 430R-PL
Difference
Module efficiency
21.44 %
20.40 %
1.04 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.390 %/°C
0.090 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
665 Wp
430 Wp
235 W more power
Power density
214.3 Wp/m²
203.6 Wp/m²
10.7 Wp/m² higher
Weight
38.0 kg
21.7 kg
16.3 kg lighter
Product warranty
12 yrs
30 yrs
18 yrs longer
Weight per kWp
57.1 kg/kWp
50.5 kg/kWp
6.7 kg/kWp lighter
Short-circuit current
17.87 A
11.87 A
6.00 A apart
Module area
3.103 m²
2.112 m²
0.991 m² apart
Current at max power
17.06 A
11.35 A
5.71 A apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Dimensions
2383x1302x30 mm
1957x1079x35 mm
2383x1302x30 mm vs 1957x1079x35 mm
Voltage at max power
39.00 V
37.90 V
1.10 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
SPV665-TG12-132BD
22,073 kWh
PowerXT 430R-PL
14,273 kWh
Lifetime gap
7,800 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
SPV665-TG12-132BD
PowerXT 430R-PL
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
665 W
430 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.2% of rated power
635 W
405 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
88.3% of rated power
605 W
380 W
Hot roof
70 °C
82.5% of rated power
575 W
355 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
SPV665-TG12-132BD
PowerXT 430R-PL
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
665 Wp
430 Wp
+235 W for SPV665-TG12-132BD
Module efficiency
21.44 %
20.40 %
+1.04 pp for SPV665-TG12-132BD
Power density
214.3 Wp/m²
203.6 Wp/m²
+10.7 Wp/m² for SPV665-TG12-132BD
Open-circuit voltage
46.30 V
45.70 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
39.00 V
37.90 V
1.10 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.87 A
11.87 A
6.00 A apart
Current at max power
17.06 A
11.35 A
5.71 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.390 %/°C
+0.090 %/°C for SPV665-TG12-132BD
Mechanical
Dimensions
2383x1302x30 mm
1957x1079x35 mm
2383x1302x30 mm vs 1957x1079x35 mm
Module area
3.103 m²
2.112 m²
0.991 m² apart
Weight
38.0 kg
21.7 kg
-16.3 kg for PowerXT 430R-PL
Weight per kWp
57.1 kg/kWp
50.5 kg/kWp
-6.7 kg/kWp for PowerXT 430R-PL
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
30 yrs
+18 yrs for PowerXT 430R-PL
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
0.48 %/yr
Not published by Solaria
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
-
Not published by Solaria
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
-
Not published by Solaria
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#8,267
vs
#11,598
SPV665-TG12-132BD leads by 3,331 places
Power density
#8,232
vs
#11,673
SPV665-TG12-132BD leads by 3,441 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093
vs
#13,579
SPV665-TG12-132BD leads by 7,486 places
Weight
#11,052
vs
#3,841
PowerXT 430R-PL leads by 7,211 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,776
vs
#8,404
SPV665-TG12-132BD leads by 5,628 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria SPV665-TG12-132BD vs Solaria SPV680-TG12-132BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria SPV665-TG12-132BD vs Solaria SPV675-TG12-132BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria SPV665-TG12-132BD vs Solaria SPV670-TG12-132BD
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria SPV665-TG12-132BD vs Solaria SPV660-TG12-132BD
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria PowerXT 430R-PL vs Solaria Solaria PowerXT-430C-PD
10 differences, the largest is performance warranty
Same series, other bin
Solaria
Solaria PowerXT 430R-PL vs Solaria PowerXT 420R-PL
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Solaria SPV665-TG12-132BD or Solaria PowerXT 430R-PL?
According to our database: Solaria SPV665-TG12-132BD has higher module efficiency (21.44% vs 20.40%); Solaria SPV665-TG12-132BD tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.390%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Solaria SPV665-TG12-132BD and Solaria PowerXT 430R-PL?
Solaria SPV665-TG12-132BD has a module efficiency of 21.44%, while Solaria PowerXT 430R-PL is 20.40%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Solaria SPV665-TG12-132BD use vs Solaria PowerXT 430R-PL?
Solaria SPV665-TG12-132BD uses TOPCon cells; Solaria PowerXT 430R-PL uses Monocrystalline. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Solaria SPV665-TG12-132BD and Solaria PowerXT 430R-PL?
Solaria SPV665-TG12-132BD has a 30 years power warranty; Solaria PowerXT 430R-PL has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Solaria SPV665-TG12-132BD and Solaria PowerXT 430R-PL bifacial panels?
Solaria SPV665-TG12-132BD is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Solaria PowerXT 430R-PL is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 1 Solaria offer
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.