Skip to main content
605M-132-BD vs 630M-132-BD 15 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD

Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD
Solarever
SE-182*105-605M-132-BD
605 Wp 22.40 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD
Solarever
SE-182*105-630M-132-BD
630 Wp 23.32 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

630M-132-BD leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.92 pp more efficient. 15 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 4 differences
How alike are they
15 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

4 of 19 parameters
Parameter 605M-132-BD 630M-132-BD Difference
Module efficiency 22.40 % 23.32 % 0.92 pp more efficient
Power density 224.0 Wp/m² 233.2 Wp/m² 9.3 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 605 Wp 630 Wp 25 W more power
Weight per kWp 53.6 kg/kWp 51.4 kg/kWp 2.1 kg/kWp lighter
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
605M-132-BD
20,299 kWh
630M-132-BD
21,138 kWh
Lifetime gap
839 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 605M-132-BD 630M-132-BD
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 605 W 630 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 579 W 603 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 552 W 575 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 526 W 548 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 605M-132-BD 630M-132-BD Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 605 Wp 630 Wp +25 W for 630M-132-BD
Module efficiency 22.40 % 23.32 % +0.92 pp for 630M-132-BD
Power density 224.0 Wp/m² 233.2 Wp/m² +9.3 Wp/m² for 630M-132-BD
Open-circuit voltage 48.59 V 49.34 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.18 V 41.82 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 15.86 A 16.27 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 14.69 A 15.06 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2382x1134x30 mm 2382x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.701 m² 2.701 m² Same
Weight 32.4 kg 32.4 kg Same
Weight per kWp 53.6 kg/kWp 51.4 kg/kWp -2.1 kg/kWp for 630M-132-BD
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#4,774 vs #973
630M-132-BD leads by 3,801 places
Power density
#4,780 vs #1,003
630M-132-BD leads by 3,777 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,549 vs #4,804
630M-132-BD leads by 2,745 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,064 vs #1,630
630M-132-BD leads by 1,434 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-620M-132-BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-615M-132-BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-610M-132-BD
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-600M-132-BD
One difference: module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-470M-96-BD
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD or Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD?
According to our database: Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD has higher module efficiency (23.32% vs 22.40%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD and Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD?
Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD has a module efficiency of 22.40%, while Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD is 23.32%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD use vs Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD?
Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD uses TOPCon cells; Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD and Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD?
Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD has a 30 years power warranty; Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD and Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD bifacial panels?
Both Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD and Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 1 Solarever offer

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.