Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-610M-132-BD
VS
The verdict
610M-132-BD leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.20 pp more efficient. 18 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See the one differenceHow alike are they
18
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
1 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
605M-132-BD
610M-132-BD
Difference
Module efficiency
22.40 %
22.60 %
0.20 pp more efficient
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
605M-132-BD
20,299 kWh
610M-132-BD
20,467 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
605M-132-BD
610M-132-BD
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
605 W
610 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
579 W
583 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
552 W
557 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
526 W
530 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
605M-132-BD
610M-132-BD
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
605 Wp
610 Wp
Effectively the same
Module efficiency
22.40 %
22.60 %
+0.20 pp for 610M-132-BD
Power density
224.0 Wp/m²
225.8 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
48.59 V
48.74 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
41.18 V
41.31 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
15.86 A
15.94 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
14.69 A
14.77 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2382x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
2.701 m²
2.701 m²
Same
Weight
32.4 kg
32.4 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
53.6 kg/kWp
53.1 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#4,774
vs
#3,658
610M-132-BD leads by 1,116 places
Power density
#4,780
vs
#3,729
610M-132-BD leads by 1,051 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,549
vs
#6,906
610M-132-BD leads by 643 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,064
vs
#2,670
610M-132-BD leads by 394 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-620M-132-BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-615M-132-BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-600M-132-BD
One difference: module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-470M-96-BD
12 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD or Solarever SE-182*105-610M-132-BD?
According to our database: Solarever SE-182*105-610M-132-BD has higher module efficiency (22.60% vs 22.40%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD and Solarever SE-182*105-610M-132-BD?
Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD has a module efficiency of 22.40%, while Solarever SE-182*105-610M-132-BD is 22.60%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD use vs Solarever SE-182*105-610M-132-BD?
Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD uses TOPCon cells; Solarever SE-182*105-610M-132-BD uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD and Solarever SE-182*105-610M-132-BD?
Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD has a 30 years power warranty; Solarever SE-182*105-610M-132-BD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD and Solarever SE-182*105-610M-132-BD bifacial panels?
Both Solarever SE-182*105-605M-132-BD and Solarever SE-182*105-610M-132-BD are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 1 Solarever offer
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.