Solarever SE-182*105-465M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD
VS
The verdict
9 differences, and they point both ways
The largest is rated power: 160 W more power. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 9 differencesHow alike are they
10
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
9 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
465M-96-BD
625M-132-BD
Difference
Rated power
465 Wp
625 Wp
160 W more power
Weight
23.0 kg
32.4 kg
9.4 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage
35.57 V
49.19 V
13.62 V apart
Module area
1.998 m²
2.701 m²
0.703 m² apart
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.010 %/°C better in heat
Voltage at max power
30.62 V
41.69 V
11.07 V apart
Cell count
96
132
36 cells apart
Weight per kWp
49.5 kg/kWp
51.8 kg/kWp
2.4 kg/kWp lighter
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
465M-96-BD
15,602 kWh
625M-132-BD
20,970 kWh
Lifetime gap
5,368 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
465M-96-BD
625M-132-BD
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
465 W
625 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
444 W
598 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
423 W
571 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
402 W
543 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
465M-96-BD
625M-132-BD
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
465 Wp
625 Wp
+160 W for 625M-132-BD
Module efficiency
23.27 %
23.13 %
Effectively the same
Power density
232.7 Wp/m²
231.4 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
35.57 V
49.19 V
13.62 V apart
Voltage at max power
30.62 V
41.69 V
11.07 V apart
Short-circuit current
16.20 A
16.19 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
15.19 A
14.99 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.010 %/°C for 625M-132-BD
Mechanical
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
2382x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area
1.998 m²
2.701 m²
0.703 m² apart
Weight
23.0 kg
32.4 kg
-9.4 kg for 465M-96-BD
Weight per kWp
49.5 kg/kWp
51.8 kg/kWp
-2.4 kg/kWp for 465M-96-BD
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
96
132
36 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,202
vs
#1,563
465M-96-BD leads by 361 places
Power density
#1,115
vs
#1,513
465M-96-BD leads by 398 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093
vs
#2,165
625M-132-BD leads by 3,928 places
Weight
#2,991
vs
#5,218
465M-96-BD leads by 2,227 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,858
vs
#1,833
625M-132-BD leads by 5,025 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-465M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-470M-96-BD
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-465M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-460M-96-BD
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-465M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-455M-96-BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-465M-96-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-450M-96-BD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-630M-132-BD
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Solarever
Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD vs Solarever SE-182*105-620M-132-BD
The same specification on paper
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Solarever SE-182*105-465M-96-BD or Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD?
According to our database: Solarever SE-182*105-465M-96-BD has higher module efficiency (23.27% vs 23.13%); Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Solarever SE-182*105-465M-96-BD and Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD?
Solarever SE-182*105-465M-96-BD has a module efficiency of 23.27%, while Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD is 23.13%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Solarever SE-182*105-465M-96-BD use vs Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD?
Solarever SE-182*105-465M-96-BD uses TOPCon cells; Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Solarever SE-182*105-465M-96-BD and Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD?
Solarever SE-182*105-465M-96-BD has a 30 years power warranty; Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Solarever SE-182*105-465M-96-BD and Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD bifacial panels?
Both Solarever SE-182*105-465M-96-BD and Solarever SE-182*105-625M-132-BD are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 1 Solarever offer
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.