Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W vs Solar-Fabrik S4-DG460-96TMax (White)
Solar-Fabrik
Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W
460 Wp
23.02 %
TOPCon
Bifacial
Incomplete
VS
Solar-Fabrik
S4-DG460-96TMax (White)
460 Wp
23.02 %
TOPCon
Bifacial
Incomplete
The verdict
S4-DG460-96TMax (White) leads on the differences that matter
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.020 %/°C better in heat. 17 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.
See the one differenceHow alike are they
17
of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
not published
01
1 of 18 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W
S4-DG460-96TMax (White)
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.310 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W
15,434 kWh
S4-DG460-96TMax (White)
15,434 kWh
Lifetime gap
No difference
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W
S4-DG460-96TMax (White)
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
460 W
460 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.3% of rated power
439 W
440 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
90.7% of rated power
417 W
420 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.0% of rated power
396 W
400 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W
S4-DG460-96TMax (White)
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
460 Wp
460 Wp
Same
Module efficiency
23.02 %
23.02 %
Same
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
230.2 Wp/m²
Same
Open-circuit voltage
36.46 V
36.46 V
Same
Voltage at max power
30.51 V
30.51 V
Same
Short-circuit current
15.80 A
15.80 A
Same
Current at max power
15.08 A
15.08 A
Same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.310 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for S4-DG460-96TMax (White)
Mechanical
Dimensions
1762x1134x30 mm
1762x1134x30 mm
Same
Module area
1.998 m²
1.998 m²
Same
Weight
24.9 kg
24.9 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
54.1 kg/kWp
54.1 kg/kWp
Same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
-
-
Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
96
96
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,797
vs
#1,797
Tied - the same position in the database
Power density
#1,876
vs
#1,876
Tied - the same position in the database
Heat behaviour
#8,005
vs
#2,165
S4-DG460-96TMax (White) leads by 5,840 places
Weight
#8,347
vs
#8,347
Tied - the same position in the database
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,310
vs
#4,310
Tied - the same position in the database
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Solar-Fabrik
Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W vs Solar-Fabrik S4-DG625-132TMax
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Solar-Fabrik
Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W vs Solar-Fabrik S4-DG620-132TMax
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Solar-Fabrik
Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W vs Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 455W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Solar-Fabrik
Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W vs Solar-Fabrik S4-DG455-96TMax (White)
2 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Solar-Fabrik
Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W vs Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 450W
9 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Solar-Fabrik
Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W vs Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 445W
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W or Solar-Fabrik S4-DG460-96TMax (White)?
According to our database: Solar-Fabrik S4-DG460-96TMax (White) tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.310%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W and Solar-Fabrik S4-DG460-96TMax (White)?
Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460 W has a module efficiency of 23.02%, while Solar-Fabrik S4-DG460-96TMax (White) is 23.02%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W use vs Solar-Fabrik S4-DG460-96TMax (White)?
Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460 W uses TOPCon cells; Solar-Fabrik S4-DG460-96TMax (White) uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W and Solar-Fabrik S4-DG460-96TMax (White)?
Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460 W has a 30 years power warranty; Solar-Fabrik S4-DG460-96TMax (White) has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W and Solar-Fabrik S4-DG460-96TMax (White) bifacial panels?
Both Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460 W and Solar-Fabrik S4-DG460-96TMax (White) are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 19 Solar-Fabrik offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.