Skip to main content
460W vs 455W 17 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W vs Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 455W

Solar-Fabrik
Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W
460 Wp 23.02 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
VS
Solar-Fabrik
Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 455W
455 Wp 22.80 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
The verdict

460W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.22 pp more efficient. 17 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See the one difference
How alike are they
17 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

1 of 18 parameters
Parameter 460W 455W Difference
Module efficiency 23.02 % 22.80 % 0.22 pp more efficient
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.310 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
460W
15,434 kWh
455W
15,266 kWh
Lifetime gap
168 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 460W 455W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 460 W 455 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.3% of rated power 439 W 434 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 90.7% of rated power 417 W 413 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.0% of rated power 396 W 392 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 460W 455W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 460 Wp 455 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 23.02 % 22.80 % +0.22 pp for 460W
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 227.7 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 36.46 V 36.21 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 30.51 V 30.27 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 15.80 A 15.75 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 15.08 A 15.03 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.310 %/°C -0.310 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.998 m² 1.998 m² Same
Weight 24.9 kg 24.9 kg Same
Weight per kWp 54.1 kg/kWp 54.7 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 96 96 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,797 vs #2,714
460W leads by 917 places
Power density
#1,876 vs #2,888
460W leads by 1,012 places
Heat behaviour
#8,005 vs #8,005
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#8,347 vs #9,129
460W leads by 782 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,310 vs #4,712
460W leads by 402 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Solar-Fabrik
Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W vs Solar-Fabrik S4-DG625-132TMax
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Solar-Fabrik
Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W vs Solar-Fabrik S4-DG620-132TMax
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Solar-Fabrik
Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W vs Solar-Fabrik S4-DG460-96TMax (White)
One difference: temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Solar-Fabrik
Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W vs Solar-Fabrik S4-DG455-96TMax (White)
2 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Solar-Fabrik
Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W vs Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 450W
9 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Solar-Fabrik
Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W vs Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 445W
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W or Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 455W?
According to our database: Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460 W has higher module efficiency (23.02% vs 22.80%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W and Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 455W?
Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460 W has a module efficiency of 23.02%, while Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 455 W is 22.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W use vs Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 455W?
Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460 W uses TOPCon cells; Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 455 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W and Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 455W?
Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460 W has a 30 years power warranty; Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 455 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460W and Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 455W bifacial panels?
Both Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 460 W and Solar-Fabrik Mono S4 Halfcut Trend White 455 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 19 Solar-Fabrik offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.