Skip to main content
620 XL vs 570 XM+ BIFACIAL 10 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Silfab SIL-620 XL vs Silfab SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL

Silfab
SIL-620 XL
620 Wp 22.20 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Silfab
SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL
570 Wp 22.10 % N-type Bifacial Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

620 XL leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 50 W more power. 10 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 8 differences
How alike are they
10 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

8 of 18 parameters
Parameter 620 XL 570 XM+ BIFACIAL Difference
Rated power 620 Wp 570 Wp 50 W more power
Open-circuit voltage 57.21 V 52.03 V 5.18 V apart
Module area 2.793 m² 2.581 m² 0.212 m² apart
Voltage at max power 48.16 V 43.74 V 4.42 V apart
Cell count 156 144 12 cells apart
Weight per kWp 47.6 kg/kWp 50.0 kg/kWp 2.4 kg/kWp lighter
Weight 29.5 kg 28.5 kg 1.0 kg lighter
Dimensions 2465x1133x35 mm 2278x1133x35 mm 2465x1133x35 mm vs 2278x1133x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared first-year losses, with 0.40% a year afterwards assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
620 XL
20,579 kWh
570 XM+ BIFACIAL
18,919 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,660 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 620 XL 570 XM+ BIFACIAL
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 620 W 570 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 593 W 545 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 566 W 520 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 539 W 496 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 620 XL 570 XM+ BIFACIAL Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 620 Wp 570 Wp +50 W for 620 XL
Module efficiency 22.20 % 22.10 % Effectively the same
Power density 222.0 Wp/m² 220.8 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 57.21 V 52.03 V 5.18 V apart
Voltage at max power 48.16 V 43.74 V 4.42 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.55 A 13.79 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 12.87 A 13.03 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.290 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2465x1133x35 mm 2278x1133x35 mm 2465x1133x35 mm vs 2278x1133x35 mm
Module area 2.793 m² 2.581 m² 0.212 m² apart
Weight 29.5 kg 28.5 kg -1.0 kg for 570 XM+ BIFACIAL
Weight per kWp 47.6 kg/kWp 50.0 kg/kWp -2.4 kg/kWp for 620 XL
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.30 %/yr - Not published by Silfab
Technology
Cell technology N-type N-type Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 156 144 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#5,817 vs #6,012
620 XL leads by 195 places
Power density
#5,849 vs #6,015
620 XL leads by 166 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165 vs #2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#1,761 vs #3,575
620 XL leads by 1,814 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,404 vs #2,566
620 XL leads by 1,162 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-620 XL vs Silfab SIL-640 XL
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-620 XL vs Silfab SIL-630 XL
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Silfab
Silfab SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL vs Silfab SIL-570 XM+
The same specification on paper
Same manufacturer
Silfab
Silfab SIL-620 XL vs Silfab SIL-590 XM+
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Silfab
Silfab SIL-620 XL vs Silfab SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same manufacturer
Silfab
Silfab SIL-620 XL vs Silfab SIL-540-XM-BIFACIAL
9 differences, the largest is rated power
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Silfab SIL-620 XL or Silfab SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL?
According to our database: Silfab SIL-620 XL has higher module efficiency (22.20% vs 22.10%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Silfab SIL-620 XL and Silfab SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL?
Silfab SIL-620 XL has a module efficiency of 22.20%, while Silfab SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL is 22.10%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Silfab SIL-620 XL use vs Silfab SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL?
Silfab SIL-620 XL uses N-type cells; Silfab SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Silfab SIL-620 XL and Silfab SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL?
Silfab SIL-620 XL has a 30 years power warranty; Silfab SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Silfab SIL-620 XL and Silfab SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL bifacial panels?
Both Silfab SIL-620 XL and Silfab SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 2 Silfab offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.