Skip to main content
S700M66NT4BF vs S700M66HT4BF 12 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF vs Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF

Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF
Shinson Technology
S700M66NT4BF
700 Wp 22.53 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF
Shinson Technology
S700M66HT4BF
700 Wp 22.53 % HJT Bifacial
The verdict

S700M66HT4BF leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.050 %/°C better in heat. 12 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 7 differences
How alike are they
12 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

7 of 19 parameters
Parameter S700M66NT4BF S700M66HT4BF Difference
Temperature coefficient -0.310 %/°C -0.260 %/°C 0.050 %/°C better in heat
Short-circuit current 18.89 A 17.43 A 1.46 A apart
Open-circuit voltage 47.26 V 50.13 V 2.87 V apart
Cell technology TOPCon HJT TOPCon vs HJT
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.35 %/yr 0.05 %/yr slower
Voltage at max power 39.33 V 42.10 V 2.77 V apart
Current at max power 17.80 A 16.63 A 1.17 A apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared annual degradation, with a 1.0% first-year loss assumed for both panels because at least one datasheet omits it, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
S700M66NT4BF
23,486 kWh
S700M66HT4BF
23,669 kWh
Lifetime gap
183 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario S700M66NT4BF S700M66HT4BF
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 700 W 700 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.3% of rated power 667 W 673 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 90.7% of rated power 635 W 645 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.0% of rated power 602 W 618 W
03

Full specification

Parameter S700M66NT4BF S700M66HT4BF Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 700 Wp 700 Wp Same
Module efficiency 22.53 % 22.53 % Same
Power density 225.3 Wp/m² 225.3 Wp/m² Same
Open-circuit voltage 47.26 V 50.13 V 2.87 V apart
Voltage at max power 39.33 V 42.10 V 2.77 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.89 A 17.43 A 1.46 A apart
Current at max power 17.80 A 16.63 A 1.17 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.310 %/°C -0.260 %/°C +0.050 %/°C for S700M66HT4BF
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.0 kg 38.7 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 54.3 kg/kWp 55.3 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.35 %/yr -0.05 %/yr for S700M66HT4BF
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon HJT TOPCon vs HJT
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#3,982 vs #3,982
Tied - the same position in the database
Power density
#3,989 vs #3,989
Tied - the same position in the database
Heat behaviour
#8,005 vs #511
S700M66HT4BF leads by 7,494 places
Weight
#8,524 vs #9,733
S700M66NT4BF leads by 1,209 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#114 vs #116
S700M66NT4BF leads by 2 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF vs Shinson Technology S720M66HT4BF
10 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF vs Shinson Technology S715M66HT4BF
10 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF vs Shinson Technology S710M66HT4BF
10 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF vs Shinson Technology S705M66HT4BF
7 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF vs Shinson Technology S695M66NT4BF
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Shinson Technology
Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF vs Shinson Technology S690M66NT4BF
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF or Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF?
According to our database: Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.310%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF and Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF?
Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF has a module efficiency of 22.53%, while Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF is 22.53%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF use vs Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF?
Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF uses TOPCon cells; Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF and Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF?
Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF has a 30 years power warranty; Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF and Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF bifacial panels?
Both Shinson Technology S700M66NT4BF and Shinson Technology S700M66HT4BF are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.