Skip to main content
GSD8K66H-735WT vs LX-720M/210-132+ GG 13 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT vs Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG

Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT
Sharp
GSD8K66H-735WT
735 Wp 23.66 % HJT Bifacial
VS
Luxor Solar
LX-720M/210-132+ GG
720 Wp 23.39 % HJT Bifacial
The verdict

LX-720M/210-132+ GG leads on the differences that matter

The largest is product warranty: 5 yrs longer. 13 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 6 differences
How alike are they
13 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

6 of 19 parameters
Parameter GSD8K66H-735WT LX-720M/210-132+ GG Difference
Product warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs 5 yrs longer
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.21 %/yr 0.14 %/yr slower
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.240 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency 23.66 % 23.39 % 0.27 pp more efficient
Power density 236.6 Wp/m² 231.8 Wp/m² 4.8 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 735 Wp 720 Wp 15 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
GSD8K66H-735WT
24,853 kWh
LX-720M/210-132+ GG
24,872 kWh
Lifetime gap
19 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario GSD8K66H-735WT LX-720M/210-132+ GG
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 735 W 720 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.1% of rated power 706 W 694 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.2% of rated power 678 W 668 W
Hot roof 70 °C 88.3% of rated power 649 W 642 W
03

Full specification

Parameter GSD8K66H-735WT LX-720M/210-132+ GG Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 735 Wp 720 Wp +15 W for GSD8K66H-735WT
Module efficiency 23.66 % 23.39 % +0.27 pp for GSD8K66H-735WT
Power density 236.6 Wp/m² 231.8 Wp/m² +4.8 Wp/m² for GSD8K66H-735WT
Open-circuit voltage 51.50 V 51.39 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 43.60 V 43.68 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 17.72 A 17.54 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 16.87 A 16.49 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.240 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for LX-720M/210-132+ GG
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 39.0 kg 38.7 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 53.1 kg/kWp 53.8 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs +5 yrs for LX-720M/210-132+ GG
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.21 %/yr -0.14 %/yr for LX-720M/210-132+ GG
Technology
Cell technology HJT HJT Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#602 vs #925
GSD8K66H-735WT leads by 323 places
Power density
#582 vs #1,347
GSD8K66H-735WT leads by 765 places
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #13
LX-720M/210-132+ GG leads by 498 places
Weight
#6,818 vs #7,805
GSD8K66H-735WT leads by 987 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#21 vs #17
LX-720M/210-132+ GG leads by 4 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Sharp
Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT vs Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Sharp
Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT vs Sharp GSD8K66H-730WT
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Sharp
Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT vs Sharp GSD8K66H-725WT
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sharp
Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT vs Sharp GSD8K66H-720WT
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sharp
Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT vs Sharp GSD8K66H-715WT
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sharp
Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT vs Sharp GSD8K66H-710WT
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT or Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG?
According to our database: Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT has higher module efficiency (23.66% vs 23.39%); Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.260%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT and Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG?
Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT has a module efficiency of 23.66%, while Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG is 23.39%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT use vs Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG?
Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT uses HJT cells; Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT and Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG?
Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT has a 30 years power warranty; Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT and Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG bifacial panels?
Both Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT and Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Compare Sharp and Luxor Solar as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 6 Sharp offers · See 8 Luxor Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.