Skip to main content
LX-720M/210-132+ GG vs GSD8K66H-735WT 13 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG vs Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT

Luxor Solar
LX-720M/210-132+ GG
720 Wp 23.39 % HJT Bifacial
VS
Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT
Sharp
GSD8K66H-735WT
735 Wp 23.66 % HJT Bifacial
The verdict

LX-720M/210-132+ GG leads on the differences that matter

The largest is product warranty: 5 yrs longer. 13 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 6 differences
How alike are they
13 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

6 of 19 parameters
Parameter LX-720M/210-132+ GG GSD8K66H-735WT Difference
Product warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs 5 yrs longer
Annual degradation 0.21 %/yr 0.35 %/yr 0.14 %/yr slower
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.260 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency 23.39 % 23.66 % 0.27 pp more efficient
Power density 231.8 Wp/m² 236.6 Wp/m² 4.8 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 720 Wp 735 Wp 15 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
LX-720M/210-132+ GG
24,872 kWh
GSD8K66H-735WT
24,853 kWh
Lifetime gap
19 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario LX-720M/210-132+ GG GSD8K66H-735WT
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 720 W 735 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.1% of rated power 694 W 706 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.2% of rated power 668 W 678 W
Hot roof 70 °C 88.3% of rated power 642 W 649 W
03

Full specification

Parameter LX-720M/210-132+ GG GSD8K66H-735WT Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 720 Wp 735 Wp +15 W for GSD8K66H-735WT
Module efficiency 23.39 % 23.66 % +0.27 pp for GSD8K66H-735WT
Power density 231.8 Wp/m² 236.6 Wp/m² +4.8 Wp/m² for GSD8K66H-735WT
Open-circuit voltage 51.39 V 51.50 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 43.68 V 43.60 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 17.54 A 17.72 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 16.49 A 16.87 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.260 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for LX-720M/210-132+ GG
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.7 kg 39.0 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 53.8 kg/kWp 53.1 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs +5 yrs for LX-720M/210-132+ GG
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.21 %/yr 0.35 %/yr -0.14 %/yr for LX-720M/210-132+ GG
Technology
Cell technology HJT HJT Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#925 vs #602
GSD8K66H-735WT leads by 323 places
Power density
#1,347 vs #582
GSD8K66H-735WT leads by 765 places
Heat behaviour
#13 vs #511
LX-720M/210-132+ GG leads by 498 places
Weight
#7,805 vs #6,818
GSD8K66H-735WT leads by 987 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#17 vs #21
LX-720M/210-132+ GG leads by 4 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+GG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-715M/210-132+ GG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-710M/210-132+GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-710M/210-132+ GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-705M/210-132+GG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG or Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT?
According to our database: Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT has higher module efficiency (23.66% vs 23.39%); Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.260%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG and Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT?
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG has a module efficiency of 23.39%, while Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT is 23.66%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG use vs Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT?
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG uses HJT cells; Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG and Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT?
Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG has a 30 years power warranty; Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG and Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT bifacial panels?
Both Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG and Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Compare Luxor Solar and Sharp as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 9 Luxor Solar offers · See 6 Sharp offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.