Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720
VS
The verdict
GSD8K66H-735WT leads on the differences that matter
The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.030 %/°C better in heat. 6 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 13 differencesHow alike are they
6
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
13 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
GSD8K66H-735WT
CME-132BDS-720
Difference
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Product warranty
25 yrs
30 yrs
5 yrs longer
Module efficiency
23.66 %
23.21 %
0.45 pp more efficient
Power density
236.6 Wp/m²
232.1 Wp/m²
4.6 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
735 Wp
720 Wp
15 W more power
Weight
39.0 kg
37.0 kg
2.0 kg lighter
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Open-circuit voltage
51.50 V
49.10 V
2.40 V apart
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
0.05 %/yr slower
Short-circuit current
17.72 A
18.43 A
0.71 A apart
Voltage at max power
43.60 V
41.30 V
2.30 V apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Current at max power
16.87 A
17.43 A
0.56 A apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
GSD8K66H-735WT
24,853 kWh
CME-132BDS-720
24,157 kWh
Lifetime gap
696 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
GSD8K66H-735WT
CME-132BDS-720
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
735 W
720 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
706 W
689 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
678 W
657 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
649 W
626 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
GSD8K66H-735WT
CME-132BDS-720
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
735 Wp
720 Wp
+15 W for GSD8K66H-735WT
Module efficiency
23.66 %
23.21 %
+0.45 pp for GSD8K66H-735WT
Power density
236.6 Wp/m²
232.1 Wp/m²
+4.6 Wp/m² for GSD8K66H-735WT
Open-circuit voltage
51.50 V
49.10 V
2.40 V apart
Voltage at max power
43.60 V
41.30 V
2.30 V apart
Short-circuit current
17.72 A
18.43 A
0.71 A apart
Current at max power
16.87 A
17.43 A
0.56 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.260 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for GSD8K66H-735WT
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x35 mm
2383x1302x30 mm
2384x1303x35 mm vs 2383x1302x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
3.103 m²
Effectively the same
Weight
39.0 kg
37.0 kg
-2.0 kg for CME-132BDS-720
Weight per kWp
53.1 kg/kWp
51.4 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
30 yrs
+5 yrs for CME-132BDS-720
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.35 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
-0.05 %/yr for GSD8K66H-735WT
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#602
vs
#1,299
GSD8K66H-735WT leads by 697 places
Power density
#582
vs
#1,339
GSD8K66H-735WT leads by 757 places
Heat behaviour
#511
vs
#2,165
GSD8K66H-735WT leads by 1,654 places
Weight
#6,818
vs
#4,775
CME-132BDS-720 leads by 2,043 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#21
vs
#22
GSD8K66H-735WT leads by 1 place
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Sharp
Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT vs Sharp GSD8K66H-740WT
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Sharp
Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT vs Sharp GSD8K66H-730WT
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Sharp
Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT vs Sharp GSD8K66H-725WT
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sharp
Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT vs Sharp GSD8K66H-720WT
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sharp
Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT vs Sharp GSD8K66H-715WT
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Sharp
Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT vs Sharp GSD8K66H-710WT
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT or AE Solar CME-132BDS-720?
According to our database: Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT has higher module efficiency (23.66% vs 23.21%); Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT and AE Solar CME-132BDS-720?
Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT has a module efficiency of 23.66%, while AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 is 23.21%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT use vs AE Solar CME-132BDS-720?
Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT uses HJT cells; AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT and AE Solar CME-132BDS-720?
Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT has a 30 years power warranty; AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT and AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 bifacial panels?
Both Sharp GSD8K66H-735WT and AE Solar CME-132BDS-720 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 6 Sharp offers · See 4 AE Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.