Skip to main content
DH132N10-730 vs DH132H10-740 10 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Runergy HY-DH132N10-730 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-740

Runergy
HY-DH132N10-730
730 Wp 23.50 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page
VS
Runergy
HY-DH132H10-740
740 Wp 23.80 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page
The verdict

DH132H10-740 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.030 %/°C better in heat. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
10 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

9 of 19 parameters
Parameter DH132N10-730 DH132H10-740 Difference
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.260 %/°C 0.030 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency 23.50 % 23.80 % 0.30 pp more efficient
Cell technology N-type HJT N-type vs HJT
Power density 235.0 Wp/m² 238.2 Wp/m² 3.2 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 730 Wp 740 Wp 10 W more power
Open-circuit voltage 49.77 V 51.34 V 1.57 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.59 A 17.91 A 0.68 A apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Voltage at max power 41.67 V 43.25 V 1.58 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
DH132N10-730
24,493 kWh
DH132H10-740
24,906 kWh
Lifetime gap
413 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario DH132N10-730 DH132H10-740
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 730 W 740 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 698 W 711 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 666 W 682 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 635 W 653 W
03

Full specification

Parameter DH132N10-730 DH132H10-740 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 730 Wp 740 Wp +10 W for DH132H10-740
Module efficiency 23.50 % 23.80 % +0.30 pp for DH132H10-740
Power density 235.0 Wp/m² 238.2 Wp/m² +3.2 Wp/m² for DH132H10-740
Open-circuit voltage 49.77 V 51.34 V 1.57 V apart
Voltage at max power 41.67 V 43.25 V 1.58 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.59 A 17.91 A 0.68 A apart
Current at max power 17.52 A 17.11 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.260 %/°C +0.030 %/°C for DH132H10-740
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.5 kg 38.3 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 52.7 kg/kWp 51.8 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.38 %/yr Effectively the same
Technology
Cell technology N-type HJT N-type vs HJT
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

13,953 panels
Efficiency
#708 vs #429
DH132H10-740 leads by 279 places
Power density
#790 vs #427
DH132H10-740 leads by 363 places
Heat behaviour
#2,146 vs #511
DH132H10-740 leads by 1,635 places
Weight
#6,358 vs #5,095
DH132H10-740 leads by 1,263 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#313 vs #178
DH132H10-740 leads by 135 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132N10-730 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-740
8 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132N10-730 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-735
6 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132N10-730 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-730
6 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132N10-730 vs Runergy HY-DH132N10-725
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132N10-730 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-725
7 differences, the largest is temperature coefficient
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132N10-730 vs Runergy HY-DH132N10-720
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Runergy HY-DH132N10-730 or Runergy HY-DH132H10-740?
According to our database: Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 has higher module efficiency (23.80% vs 23.50%); Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Runergy HY-DH132N10-730 and Runergy HY-DH132H10-740?
Runergy HY-DH132N10-730 has a module efficiency of 23.50%, while Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 is 23.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Runergy HY-DH132N10-730 use vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-740?
Runergy HY-DH132N10-730 uses N-type cells; Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Runergy HY-DH132N10-730 and Runergy HY-DH132H10-740?
Runergy HY-DH132N10-730 has a 30 years power warranty; Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Runergy HY-DH132N10-730 and Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 bifacial panels?
Both Runergy HY-DH132N10-730 and Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 2 Runergy offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.