Skip to main content
DH132H10-740 vs DH132N10-730 10 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 vs Runergy HY-DH132N10-730

Runergy
HY-DH132H10-740
740 Wp 23.80 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page
VS
Runergy
HY-DH132N10-730
730 Wp 23.50 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page
The verdict

DH132H10-740 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is temperature coefficient: 0.030 %/°C better in heat. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
10 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

9 of 19 parameters
Parameter DH132H10-740 DH132N10-730 Difference
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.290 %/°C 0.030 %/°C better in heat
Module efficiency 23.80 % 23.50 % 0.30 pp more efficient
Cell technology HJT N-type HJT vs N-type
Power density 238.2 Wp/m² 235.0 Wp/m² 3.2 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 740 Wp 730 Wp 10 W more power
Open-circuit voltage 51.34 V 49.77 V 1.57 V apart
Short-circuit current 17.91 A 18.59 A 0.68 A apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Voltage at max power 43.25 V 41.67 V 1.58 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
DH132H10-740
24,906 kWh
DH132N10-730
24,493 kWh
Lifetime gap
413 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario DH132H10-740 DH132N10-730
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 740 W 730 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 711 W 698 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 682 W 666 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 653 W 635 W
03

Full specification

Parameter DH132H10-740 DH132N10-730 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 740 Wp 730 Wp +10 W for DH132H10-740
Module efficiency 23.80 % 23.50 % +0.30 pp for DH132H10-740
Power density 238.2 Wp/m² 235.0 Wp/m² +3.2 Wp/m² for DH132H10-740
Open-circuit voltage 51.34 V 49.77 V 1.57 V apart
Voltage at max power 43.25 V 41.67 V 1.58 V apart
Short-circuit current 17.91 A 18.59 A 0.68 A apart
Current at max power 17.11 A 17.52 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.290 %/°C +0.030 %/°C for DH132H10-740
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.3 kg 38.5 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 51.8 kg/kWp 52.7 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.38 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Effectively the same
Technology
Cell technology HJT N-type HJT vs N-type
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

13,953 panels
Efficiency
#429 vs #708
DH132H10-740 leads by 279 places
Power density
#427 vs #790
DH132H10-740 leads by 363 places
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #2,146
DH132H10-740 leads by 1,635 places
Weight
#5,095 vs #6,358
DH132H10-740 leads by 1,263 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#178 vs #313
DH132H10-740 leads by 135 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-740
One difference: dimensions
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-735
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-735
One difference: dimensions
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-730
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-730
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-725
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 or Runergy HY-DH132N10-730?
According to our database: Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 has higher module efficiency (23.80% vs 23.50%); Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 and Runergy HY-DH132N10-730?
Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 has a module efficiency of 23.80%, while Runergy HY-DH132N10-730 is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 use vs Runergy HY-DH132N10-730?
Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 uses HJT cells; Runergy HY-DH132N10-730 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 and Runergy HY-DH132N10-730?
Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 has a 30 years power warranty; Runergy HY-DH132N10-730 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 and Runergy HY-DH132N10-730 bifacial panels?
Both Runergy HY-DH132H10-740 and Runergy HY-DH132N10-730 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 2 Runergy offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.