Skip to main content
DH132H10-705 vs DH132N10-730 11 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Runergy HY-DH132H10-705 vs Runergy HY-DH132N10-730

Runergy
HY-DH132H10-705
705 Wp 22.70 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Runergy
HY-DH132N10-730
730 Wp 23.50 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

DH132N10-730 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.80 pp more efficient. 11 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 8 differences
How alike are they
11 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

8 of 19 parameters
Parameter DH132H10-705 DH132N10-730 Difference
Module efficiency 22.70 % 23.50 % 0.80 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.290 %/°C 0.030 %/°C better in heat
Power density 227.0 Wp/m² 235.0 Wp/m² 8.0 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 705 Wp 730 Wp 25 W more power
Cell technology HJT N-type HJT vs N-type
Short-circuit current 17.49 A 18.59 A 1.10 A apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Current at max power 16.69 A 17.52 A 0.83 A apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
DH132H10-705
23,728 kWh
DH132N10-730
24,493 kWh
Lifetime gap
765 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario DH132H10-705 DH132N10-730
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 705 W 730 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 678 W 698 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 650 W 666 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 623 W 635 W
03

Full specification

Parameter DH132H10-705 DH132N10-730 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 705 Wp 730 Wp +25 W for DH132N10-730
Module efficiency 22.70 % 23.50 % +0.80 pp for DH132N10-730
Power density 227.0 Wp/m² 235.0 Wp/m² +8.0 Wp/m² for DH132N10-730
Open-circuit voltage 50.29 V 49.77 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 42.25 V 41.67 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 17.49 A 18.59 A 1.10 A apart
Current at max power 16.69 A 17.52 A 0.83 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.290 %/°C +0.030 %/°C for DH132H10-705
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.3 kg 38.5 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 54.3 kg/kWp 52.7 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.38 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Effectively the same
Technology
Cell technology HJT N-type HJT vs N-type
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#3,307 vs #716
DH132N10-730 leads by 2,591 places
Power density
#3,361 vs #800
DH132N10-730 leads by 2,561 places
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #2,165
DH132H10-705 leads by 1,654 places
Weight
#8,604 vs #6,396
DH132N10-730 leads by 2,208 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,007 vs #322
DH132N10-730 leads by 685 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-705 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-740
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-705 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-740
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-705 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-735
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-705 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-735
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-705 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-730
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Runergy
Runergy HY-DH132H10-705 vs Runergy HY-DH132H10-Plus-730
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Runergy HY-DH132H10-705 or Runergy HY-DH132N10-730?
According to our database: Runergy HY-DH132N10-730 has higher module efficiency (23.50% vs 22.70%); Runergy HY-DH132H10-705 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Runergy HY-DH132H10-705 and Runergy HY-DH132N10-730?
Runergy HY-DH132H10-705 has a module efficiency of 22.70%, while Runergy HY-DH132N10-730 is 23.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Runergy HY-DH132H10-705 use vs Runergy HY-DH132N10-730?
Runergy HY-DH132H10-705 uses HJT cells; Runergy HY-DH132N10-730 uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Runergy HY-DH132H10-705 and Runergy HY-DH132N10-730?
Runergy HY-DH132H10-705 has a 30 years power warranty; Runergy HY-DH132N10-730 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Runergy HY-DH132H10-705 and Runergy HY-DH132N10-730 bifacial panels?
Both Runergy HY-DH132H10-705 and Runergy HY-DH132N10-730 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 Runergy offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.