Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX
VS
The verdict
RPS2MH72BD575 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.77 pp more efficient. 2 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 17 differencesHow alike are they
2
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
17 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
RPS2MH72BD575
RPS1MH60MBXXX
Difference
Module efficiency
22.26 %
21.49 %
0.77 pp more efficient
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
5 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.330 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
575 Wp
610 Wp
35 W more power
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.55 %/yr
0.15 %/yr slower
Power density
222.6 Wp/m²
214.9 Wp/m²
7.6 Wp/m² higher
Weight per kWp
56.5 kg/kWp
50.8 kg/kWp
5.7 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage
52.90 V
41.95 V
10.95 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.58 A
18.41 A
4.83 A apart
Module area
2.583 m²
2.838 m²
0.255 m² apart
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Weight
32.5 kg
31.0 kg
1.5 kg lighter
Voltage at max power
44.61 V
34.78 V
9.83 V apart
Current at max power
12.89 A
17.54 A
4.65 A apart
Cell count
144
120
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Dimensions
2278x1134x30 mm
2178x1303x35 mm
2278x1134x30 mm vs 2178x1303x35 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
RPS2MH72BD575
19,292 kWh
RPS1MH60MBXXX
19,769 kWh
Lifetime gap
477 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
RPS2MH72BD575
RPS1MH60MBXXX
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
575 W
610 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.0% of rated power
549 W
580 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
90.1% of rated power
523 W
550 W
Hot roof
70 °C
85.2% of rated power
497 W
519 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
RPS2MH72BD575
RPS1MH60MBXXX
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
575 Wp
610 Wp
+35 W for RPS1MH60MBXXX
Module efficiency
22.26 %
21.49 %
+0.77 pp for RPS2MH72BD575
Power density
222.6 Wp/m²
214.9 Wp/m²
+7.6 Wp/m² for RPS2MH72BD575
Open-circuit voltage
52.90 V
41.95 V
10.95 V apart
Voltage at max power
44.61 V
34.78 V
9.83 V apart
Short-circuit current
13.58 A
18.41 A
4.83 A apart
Current at max power
12.89 A
17.54 A
4.65 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.330 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for RPS2MH72BD575
Mechanical
Dimensions
2278x1134x30 mm
2178x1303x35 mm
2278x1134x30 mm vs 2178x1303x35 mm
Module area
2.583 m²
2.838 m²
0.255 m² apart
Weight
32.5 kg
31.0 kg
-1.5 kg for RPS1MH60MBXXX
Weight per kWp
56.5 kg/kWp
50.8 kg/kWp
-5.7 kg/kWp for RPS1MH60MBXXX
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
25 yrs
+5 yrs for RPS2MH72BD575
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.55 %/yr
-0.15 %/yr for RPS2MH72BD575
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
PERC
TOPCon vs PERC
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
120
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#5,656
vs
#8,208
RPS2MH72BD575 leads by 2,552 places
Power density
#5,612
vs
#8,082
RPS2MH72BD575 leads by 2,470 places
Heat behaviour
#6,152
vs
#8,613
RPS2MH72BD575 leads by 2,461 places
Weight
#10,781
vs
#4,244
RPS1MH60MBXXX leads by 6,537 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#9,912
RPS2MH72BD575 leads by 9,891 places
Overall
#5,025
vs
#5,588
RPS2MH72BD575 leads by 563 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD590
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD585
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD580
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD570
The same specification on paper
Same manufacturer
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS3MH66BDXXX
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 or Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX?
According to our database: Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 has higher module efficiency (22.26% vs 21.49%); Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.330%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 and Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX?
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 has a module efficiency of 22.26%, while Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX is 21.49%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 use vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX?
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 uses TOPCon cells; Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 and Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX?
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 has a 30 years power warranty; Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 and Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX bifacial panels?
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.