Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575
VS
The verdict
RPS2MH72BD575 leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.77 pp more efficient. 2 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 17 differencesHow alike are they
2
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
17 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
RPS1MH60MBXXX
RPS2MH72BD575
Difference
Module efficiency
21.49 %
22.26 %
0.77 pp more efficient
Performance warranty
25 yrs
30 yrs
5 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient
-0.330 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
0.030 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
610 Wp
575 Wp
35 W more power
Annual degradation
0.55 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
0.15 %/yr slower
Power density
214.9 Wp/m²
222.6 Wp/m²
7.6 Wp/m² higher
Weight per kWp
50.8 kg/kWp
56.5 kg/kWp
5.7 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage
41.95 V
52.90 V
10.95 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.41 A
13.58 A
4.83 A apart
Module area
2.838 m²
2.583 m²
0.255 m² apart
Cell technology
PERC
TOPCon
PERC vs TOPCon
Weight
31.0 kg
32.5 kg
1.5 kg lighter
Voltage at max power
34.78 V
44.61 V
9.83 V apart
Current at max power
17.54 A
12.89 A
4.65 A apart
Cell count
120
144
24 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
2178x1303x35 mm
2278x1134x30 mm
2178x1303x35 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
RPS1MH60MBXXX
19,769 kWh
RPS2MH72BD575
19,292 kWh
Lifetime gap
477 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
RPS1MH60MBXXX
RPS2MH72BD575
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
610 W
575 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.0% of rated power
580 W
549 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
90.1% of rated power
550 W
523 W
Hot roof
70 °C
85.2% of rated power
519 W
497 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
RPS1MH60MBXXX
RPS2MH72BD575
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
610 Wp
575 Wp
+35 W for RPS1MH60MBXXX
Module efficiency
21.49 %
22.26 %
+0.77 pp for RPS2MH72BD575
Power density
214.9 Wp/m²
222.6 Wp/m²
+7.6 Wp/m² for RPS2MH72BD575
Open-circuit voltage
41.95 V
52.90 V
10.95 V apart
Voltage at max power
34.78 V
44.61 V
9.83 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.41 A
13.58 A
4.83 A apart
Current at max power
17.54 A
12.89 A
4.65 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.330 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
+0.030 %/°C for RPS2MH72BD575
Mechanical
Dimensions
2178x1303x35 mm
2278x1134x30 mm
2178x1303x35 mm vs 2278x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.838 m²
2.583 m²
0.255 m² apart
Weight
31.0 kg
32.5 kg
-1.5 kg for RPS1MH60MBXXX
Weight per kWp
50.8 kg/kWp
56.5 kg/kWp
-5.7 kg/kWp for RPS1MH60MBXXX
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
25 yrs
30 yrs
+5 yrs for RPS2MH72BD575
Annual degradation
0.55 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
-0.15 %/yr for RPS2MH72BD575
Technology
Cell technology
PERC
TOPCon
PERC vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
120
144
24 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#8,208
vs
#5,656
RPS2MH72BD575 leads by 2,552 places
Power density
#8,082
vs
#5,612
RPS2MH72BD575 leads by 2,470 places
Heat behaviour
#8,613
vs
#6,152
RPS2MH72BD575 leads by 2,461 places
Weight
#4,244
vs
#10,781
RPS1MH60MBXXX leads by 6,537 places
Warranty
#9,912
vs
#21
RPS2MH72BD575 leads by 9,891 places
Overall
#5,588
vs
#5,025
RPS2MH72BD575 leads by 563 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD590
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD585
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD580
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD570
The same specification on paper
Same manufacturer
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS3MH66BDXXX
16 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560
14 differences, the largest is rated power
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX or Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575?
According to our database: Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 has higher module efficiency (22.26% vs 21.49%); Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.330%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575?
Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX has a module efficiency of 21.49%, while Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 is 22.26%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX use vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575?
Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX uses PERC cells; Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575?
Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX has a 25 years power warranty; Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 bifacial panels?
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.