Skip to main content
RPS2MH72BD575 vs RPS2MH72BD590 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD590

Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575
Renew Photovoltaics
RPS2MH72BD575
575 Wp 22.26 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD590
Renew Photovoltaics
RPS2MH72BD590
590 Wp 22.84 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

RPS2MH72BD590 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.58 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter RPS2MH72BD575 RPS2MH72BD590 Difference
Module efficiency 22.26 % 22.84 % 0.58 pp more efficient
Power density 222.6 Wp/m² 228.4 Wp/m² 5.8 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 575 Wp 590 Wp 15 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
RPS2MH72BD575
19,292 kWh
RPS2MH72BD590
19,796 kWh
Lifetime gap
504 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario RPS2MH72BD575 RPS2MH72BD590
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 575 W 590 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 549 W 563 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 523 W 537 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 497 W 510 W
03

Full specification

Parameter RPS2MH72BD575 RPS2MH72BD590 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 575 Wp 590 Wp +15 W for RPS2MH72BD590
Module efficiency 22.26 % 22.84 % +0.58 pp for RPS2MH72BD590
Power density 222.6 Wp/m² 228.4 Wp/m² +5.8 Wp/m² for RPS2MH72BD590
Open-circuit voltage 52.90 V 53.25 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 44.61 V 45.15 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.58 A 13.64 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 12.89 A 13.07 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same
Weight 32.5 kg 32.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 56.5 kg/kWp 55.1 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#5,656 vs #2,672
RPS2MH72BD590 leads by 2,984 places
Power density
#5,612 vs #2,653
RPS2MH72BD590 leads by 2,959 places
Heat behaviour
#6,152 vs #6,152
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#10,781 vs #9,587
RPS2MH72BD590 leads by 1,194 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,025 vs #3,829
RPS2MH72BD590 leads by 1,196 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD585
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD580
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD570
The same specification on paper
Same manufacturer
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS3MH66BDXXX
13 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS1MH60MBXXX
17 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 or Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD590?
According to our database: Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD590 has higher module efficiency (22.84% vs 22.26%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD590?
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 has a module efficiency of 22.26%, while Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD590 is 22.84%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 use vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD590?
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 uses TOPCon cells; Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD590 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD590?
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 has a 30 years power warranty; Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD590 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD590 bifacial panels?
Both Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD575 and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD590 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.