RPS2MH72BD530 vs RPS2MH72BD560 13 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560

Q: Which panel is better: Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 or Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560?

According to our database: Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 has higher module efficiency (21.68% vs 20.52%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

Q: What is the efficiency of Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560?

Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 has a module efficiency of 20.52%, while Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 is 21.68%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

Q: What cell technology does Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 use vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560?

Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 uses PERC cells; Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

Q: What is the warranty on Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560?

Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 has a 30 years power warranty; Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Q: Are Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 bifacial panels?

Both Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Renew Photovoltaics

RPS2MH72BD530

530 Wp 20.52 % PERC Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

Renew Photovoltaics

RPS2MH72BD560

560 Wp 21.68 % PERC Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

The verdict

RPS2MH72BD560 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.16 pp more efficient. 13 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 6 differences

How alike are they

13 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical

identical differs

What actually differs

6 of 19 parameters

Parameter RPS2MH72BD530 RPS2MH72BD560 Difference

Module efficiency 20.52 % 21.68 % 1.16 pp more efficient

Power density 205.2 Wp/m² 216.8 Wp/m² 11.6 Wp/m² higher

Rated power 530 Wp 560 Wp 30 W more power

Weight per kWp 61.3 kg/kWp 58.0 kg/kWp 3.3 kg/kWp lighter

Short-circuit current 13.71 A 14.22 A 0.51 A apart

Current at max power 13.08 A 13.61 A 0.53 A apart

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Cell temperature

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.320 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

RPS2MH72BD530

17,453 kWh

RPS2MH72BD560

18,441 kWh

Lifetime gap

988 kWh

Output when it is hot

Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees

Scenario RPS2MH72BD530 RPS2MH72BD560

Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 530 W 560 W

Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.2% of rated power 505 W 533 W

Typical summer roof 55 °C 90.4% of rated power 479 W 506 W

Hot roof 70 °C 85.6% of rated power 454 W 479 W

Full specification

Parameter RPS2MH72BD530 RPS2MH72BD560 Difference

Power and efficiency

Rated power 530 Wp 560 Wp +30 W for RPS2MH72BD560

Module efficiency 20.52 % 21.68 % +1.16 pp for RPS2MH72BD560

Power density 205.2 Wp/m² 216.8 Wp/m² +11.6 Wp/m² for RPS2MH72BD560

Open-circuit voltage 49.48 V 49.84 V Effectively the same

Voltage at max power 40.53 V 41.15 V Effectively the same

Short-circuit current 13.71 A 14.22 A 0.51 A apart

Current at max power 13.08 A 13.61 A 0.53 A apart

Temperature

Temperature coefficient -0.320 %/°C -0.320 %/°C Same

Mechanical

Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm Same

Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same

Weight 32.5 kg 32.5 kg Same

Weight per kWp 61.3 kg/kWp 58.0 kg/kWp -3.3 kg/kWp for RPS2MH72BD560

Warranty and degradation

Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same

Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same

Annual degradation 0.45 %/yr 0.45 %/yr Same

Technology

Cell technology PERC PERC Same

Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same

Cell count 144 144 Same

Bifacial Yes Yes Same

Against the whole database

14,129 panels

Efficiency

#11,325 vs #7,606

RPS2MH72BD560 leads by 3,719 places

Power density

#11,336 vs #7,516

RPS2MH72BD560 leads by 3,820 places

Heat behaviour

#8,376 vs #8,376

Tied - the same position in the database

Weight

#12,723 vs #11,622

RPS2MH72BD560 leads by 1,101 places

Warranty

#21 vs #21

Tied - the same position in the database

Overall

#8,844 vs #6,185

RPS2MH72BD560 leads by 2,659 places

More useful comparisons

Open the full database

Same series, other bin

Renew Photovoltaics

Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD555

4 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Renew Photovoltaics

Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD550

4 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Renew Photovoltaics

Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD545

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Renew Photovoltaics

Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD540

3 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Renew Photovoltaics

Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535

The same specification on paper

Same manufacturer

Renew Photovoltaics

Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS3MH66BDXXX

14 differences, the largest is module efficiency

Written summary

Checking cache...

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 or Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560?

According to our database: Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 has higher module efficiency (21.68% vs 20.52%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

What is the efficiency of Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560?

Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 has a module efficiency of 20.52%, while Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 is 21.68%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

What cell technology does Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 use vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560?

Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 uses PERC cells; Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

What is the warranty on Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560?

Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 has a 30 years power warranty; Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Are Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 bifacial panels?

Both Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.