Skip to main content
RPS2MH72BD530 vs RPS2MH72BD535 19 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535

Renew Photovoltaics
RPS2MH72BD530
530 Wp 20.52 % PERC Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Renew Photovoltaics
RPS2MH72BD535
535 Wp 20.71 % PERC Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

Identical on every published parameter

All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.

How alike are they
19 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

0 of 19 parameters

Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.

02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.320 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
RPS2MH72BD530
17,453 kWh
RPS2MH72BD535
17,618 kWh
Lifetime gap
165 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario RPS2MH72BD530 RPS2MH72BD535
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 530 W 535 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.2% of rated power 505 W 509 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 90.4% of rated power 479 W 484 W
Hot roof 70 °C 85.6% of rated power 454 W 458 W
03

Full specification

Parameter RPS2MH72BD530 RPS2MH72BD535 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 530 Wp 535 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 20.52 % 20.71 % Effectively the same
Power density 205.2 Wp/m² 207.1 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 49.48 V 49.55 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 40.53 V 40.61 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.71 A 13.79 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.08 A 13.18 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.320 %/°C -0.320 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2278x1134x30 mm 2278x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 2.583 m² 2.583 m² Same
Weight 32.5 kg 32.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 61.3 kg/kWp 60.7 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.45 %/yr 0.45 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 144 144 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#11,325 vs #10,799
RPS2MH72BD535 leads by 526 places
Power density
#11,336 vs #10,842
RPS2MH72BD535 leads by 494 places
Heat behaviour
#8,376 vs #8,376
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#12,723 vs #12,618
RPS2MH72BD535 leads by 105 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,844 vs #8,411
RPS2MH72BD535 leads by 433 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD560
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD555
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD550
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD545
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD540
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Renew Photovoltaics
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS3MH66BDXXX
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 or Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535?
According to our database: Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535 has higher module efficiency (20.71% vs 20.52%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535?
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 has a module efficiency of 20.52%, while Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535 is 20.71%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 use vs Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535?
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 uses PERC cells; Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535 uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535?
Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 has a 30 years power warranty; Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535 bifacial panels?
Both Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD530 and Renew Photovoltaics RPS2MH72BD535 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.