Skip to main content
REC620AA PRO M vs REC610AA PRO M 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

REC REC620AA PRO M vs REC REC610AA PRO M

REC REC620AA PRO M
REC
REC620AA PRO M
620 Wp 21.80 % HJT Bifacial
VS
REC REC610AA PRO M
REC
REC610AA PRO M
610 Wp 21.50 % HJT Bifacial
The verdict

REC620AA PRO M leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.30 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter REC620AA PRO M REC610AA PRO M Difference
Module efficiency 21.80 % 21.50 % 0.30 pp more efficient
Power density 218.4 Wp/m² 214.9 Wp/m² 3.5 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 620 Wp 610 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.240 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
REC620AA PRO M
21,065 kWh
REC610AA PRO M
20,725 kWh
Lifetime gap
340 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario REC620AA PRO M REC610AA PRO M
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 620 W 610 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.4% of rated power 598 W 588 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.8% of rated power 575 W 566 W
Hot roof 70 °C 89.2% of rated power 553 W 544 W
03

Full specification

Parameter REC620AA PRO M REC610AA PRO M Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 620 Wp 610 Wp +10 W for REC620AA PRO M
Module efficiency 21.80 % 21.50 % +0.30 pp for REC620AA PRO M
Power density 218.4 Wp/m² 214.9 Wp/m² +3.5 Wp/m² for REC620AA PRO M
Open-circuit voltage 44.40 V 44.30 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 36.60 V 36.30 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 17.79 A 17.72 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 16.94 A 16.81 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.240 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2175x1305x30 mm 2175x1305x30 mm Same
Module area 2.838 m² 2.838 m² Same
Weight 32.5 kg 32.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 52.4 kg/kWp 53.3 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 20 yrs 20 yrs Same
Performance warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.25 %/yr 0.25 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology HJT HJT Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 120 120 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#7,022 vs #7,958
REC620AA PRO M leads by 936 places
Power density
#6,952 vs #8,029
REC620AA PRO M leads by 1,077 places
Heat behaviour
#13 vs #13
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,893 vs #7,135
REC620AA PRO M leads by 1,242 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,264 vs #3,978
REC620AA PRO M leads by 714 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC620AA PRO M vs REC REC640AA PRO M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC620AA PRO M vs REC REC630AA PRO M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC620AA PRO M vs REC REC600AA PRO M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
REC
REC REC620AA PRO M vs REC REC640AA Pro MG
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
REC
REC REC620AA PRO M vs REC REC630AA Pro MG
7 differences, the largest is performance warranty
Same manufacturer
REC
REC REC620AA PRO M vs REC REC620AA Pro MG
4 differences, the largest is performance warranty
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: REC REC620AA PRO M or REC REC610AA PRO M?
According to our database: REC REC620AA PRO M has higher module efficiency (21.80% vs 21.50%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of REC REC620AA PRO M and REC REC610AA PRO M?
REC REC620AA PRO M has a module efficiency of 21.80%, while REC REC610AA PRO M is 21.50%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does REC REC620AA PRO M use vs REC REC610AA PRO M?
REC REC620AA PRO M uses HJT cells; REC REC610AA PRO M uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on REC REC620AA PRO M and REC REC610AA PRO M?
REC REC620AA PRO M has a 25 years power warranty; REC REC610AA PRO M has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are REC REC620AA PRO M and REC REC610AA PRO M bifacial panels?
Both REC REC620AA PRO M and REC REC610AA PRO M are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 7 REC offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.