Skip to main content
REC620AA PRO M vs REC600AA PRO M 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

REC REC620AA PRO M vs REC REC600AA PRO M

REC REC620AA PRO M
REC
REC620AA PRO M
620 Wp 21.80 % HJT Bifacial
VS
REC REC600AA PRO M
REC
REC600AA PRO M
600 Wp 21.10 % HJT Bifacial
The verdict

REC620AA PRO M leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.70 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter REC620AA PRO M REC600AA PRO M Difference
Module efficiency 21.80 % 21.10 % 0.70 pp more efficient
Power density 218.4 Wp/m² 211.4 Wp/m² 7.0 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 620 Wp 600 Wp 20 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.240 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
REC620AA PRO M
21,065 kWh
REC600AA PRO M
20,385 kWh
Lifetime gap
680 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario REC620AA PRO M REC600AA PRO M
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 620 W 600 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.4% of rated power 598 W 578 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.8% of rated power 575 W 557 W
Hot roof 70 °C 89.2% of rated power 553 W 535 W
03

Full specification

Parameter REC620AA PRO M REC600AA PRO M Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 620 Wp 600 Wp +20 W for REC620AA PRO M
Module efficiency 21.80 % 21.10 % +0.70 pp for REC620AA PRO M
Power density 218.4 Wp/m² 211.4 Wp/m² +7.0 Wp/m² for REC620AA PRO M
Open-circuit voltage 44.40 V 44.20 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 36.60 V 36.00 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 17.79 A 17.65 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 16.94 A 16.67 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.240 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2175x1305x30 mm 2175x1305x30 mm Same
Module area 2.838 m² 2.838 m² Same
Weight 32.5 kg 32.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 52.4 kg/kWp 54.2 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 20 yrs 20 yrs Same
Performance warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.25 %/yr 0.25 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology HJT HJT Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 120 120 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#7,022 vs #9,297
REC620AA PRO M leads by 2,275 places
Power density
#6,952 vs #9,213
REC620AA PRO M leads by 2,261 places
Heat behaviour
#13 vs #13
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#5,893 vs #8,370
REC620AA PRO M leads by 2,477 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #9,798
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,264 vs #4,791
REC620AA PRO M leads by 1,527 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC620AA PRO M vs REC REC640AA PRO M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC620AA PRO M vs REC REC630AA PRO M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
REC
REC REC620AA PRO M vs REC REC610AA PRO M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
REC
REC REC620AA PRO M vs REC REC640AA Pro MG
7 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
REC
REC REC620AA PRO M vs REC REC630AA Pro MG
7 differences, the largest is performance warranty
Same manufacturer
REC
REC REC620AA PRO M vs REC REC620AA Pro MG
4 differences, the largest is performance warranty
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: REC REC620AA PRO M or REC REC600AA PRO M?
According to our database: REC REC620AA PRO M has higher module efficiency (21.80% vs 21.10%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of REC REC620AA PRO M and REC REC600AA PRO M?
REC REC620AA PRO M has a module efficiency of 21.80%, while REC REC600AA PRO M is 21.10%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does REC REC620AA PRO M use vs REC REC600AA PRO M?
REC REC620AA PRO M uses HJT cells; REC REC600AA PRO M uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on REC REC620AA PRO M and REC REC600AA PRO M?
REC REC620AA PRO M has a 25 years power warranty; REC REC600AA PRO M has a 25 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are REC REC620AA PRO M and REC REC600AA PRO M bifacial panels?
Both REC REC620AA PRO M and REC REC600AA PRO M are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 7 REC offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.