Premier Energies PE-575 TB M10_1A vs Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A
VS
The verdict
Identical on every published parameter
All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.
How alike are they
19
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
0 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
575 TB M10_1A
19,292 kWh
570 TB M10_1A
19,125 kWh
Lifetime gap
167 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
575 TB M10_1A
570 TB M10_1A
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
575 W
570 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
549 W
544 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
523 W
519 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
497 W
493 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
575 TB M10_1A
570 TB M10_1A
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
575 Wp
570 Wp
Effectively the same
Module efficiency
22.24 %
22.05 %
Effectively the same
Power density
222.6 Wp/m²
220.7 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
51.30 V
51.26 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
44.03 V
43.99 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
13.71 A
13.61 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
13.06 A
12.96 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2278x1134x35 mm
2278x1134x35 mm
Same
Module area
2.583 m²
2.583 m²
Same
Weight
28.0 kg
28.0 kg
Same
Weight per kWp
48.7 kg/kWp
49.1 kg/kWp
Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
144
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#5,722
vs
#6,233
575 TB M10_1A leads by 511 places
Power density
#5,549
vs
#6,058
575 TB M10_1A leads by 509 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093
vs
#6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#2,422
vs
#2,756
575 TB M10_1A leads by 334 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#4,838
vs
#5,233
575 TB M10_1A leads by 395 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-575 TB M10_1A vs Premier Energies PE-590 TB M10_1A
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-575 TB M10_1A vs Premier Energies PE-585 TB M10_1A
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-575 TB M10_1A vs Premier Energies PE-580 TB M10_1A
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-575 TB M10_1A vs Premier Energies PE-565 TB M10_1A
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-575 TB M10_1A vs Premier Energies PE-560 TB M10_1A
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Premier Energies
Premier Energies PE-575 TB M10_1A vs Premier Energies PE-590TBBG-144
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Premier Energies PE-575 TB M10_1A or Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A?
According to our database: Premier Energies PE-575 TB M10_1A has higher module efficiency (22.24% vs 22.05%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Premier Energies PE-575 TB M10_1A and Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A?
Premier Energies PE-575 TB M10_1A has a module efficiency of 22.24%, while Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A is 22.05%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Premier Energies PE-575 TB M10_1A use vs Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A?
Premier Energies PE-575 TB M10_1A uses TOPCon cells; Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Premier Energies PE-575 TB M10_1A and Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A?
Premier Energies PE-575 TB M10_1A has a 30 years power warranty; Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Premier Energies PE-575 TB M10_1A and Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A bifacial panels?
Both Premier Energies PE-575 TB M10_1A and Premier Energies PE-570 TB M10_1A are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 1 Premier Energies offer
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.