Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS690M13GFH-22/WNH
VS
The verdict
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 1.13 pp more efficient. 11 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 8 differencesHow alike are they
11
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
8 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
PS690M13GFH-22/WNH
Difference
Module efficiency
23.34 %
22.21 %
1.13 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
0.050 %/°C better in heat
Power density
233.4 Wp/m²
222.1 Wp/m²
11.3 Wp/m² higher
Rated power
725 Wp
690 Wp
35 W more power
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Open-circuit voltage
50.31 V
48.02 V
2.29 V apart
Weight per kWp
52.3 kg/kWp
54.6 kg/kWp
2.4 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power
42.25 V
40.01 V
2.24 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
24,420 kWh
PS690M13GFH-22/WNH
23,151 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,269 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
PS690M13GFH-22/WNH
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
725 W
690 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
699 W
660 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
673 W
630 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
647 W
600 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
PS690M13GFH-22/WNH
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
725 Wp
690 Wp
+35 W for PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
Module efficiency
23.34 %
22.21 %
+1.13 pp for PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
Power density
233.4 Wp/m²
222.1 Wp/m²
+11.3 Wp/m² for PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
Open-circuit voltage
50.31 V
48.02 V
2.29 V apart
Voltage at max power
42.25 V
40.01 V
2.24 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.24 A
18.26 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
17.16 A
17.25 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.240 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
+0.050 %/°C for PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
Same
Module area
3.106 m²
3.106 m²
Same
Weight
37.9 kg
37.7 kg
Effectively the same
Weight per kWp
52.3 kg/kWp
54.6 kg/kWp
-2.4 kg/kWp for PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.38 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Effectively the same
Technology
Cell technology
HJT
TOPCon
HJT vs TOPCon
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#981
vs
#5,817
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 4,836 places
Power density
#974
vs
#5,797
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 4,823 places
Heat behaviour
#13
vs
#2,220
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 2,207 places
Weight
#5,799
vs
#9,085
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 3,286 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#255
vs
#1,286
PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW leads by 1,031 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS730M13GFH-22/WSHW
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS720M13GFH-22/WSHW
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS715M13GFH-22/WSHW
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW vs Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WSHW
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS690M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS710M13GFH-22/WNH
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Phono Solar PS690M13GFH-22/WNH vs Phono Solar PS705M13GFH-22/WNH
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW or Phono Solar PS690M13GFH-22/WNH?
According to our database: Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW has higher module efficiency (23.34% vs 22.21%); Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW and Phono Solar PS690M13GFH-22/WNH?
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW has a module efficiency of 23.34%, while Phono Solar PS690M13GFH-22/WNH is 22.21%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW use vs Phono Solar PS690M13GFH-22/WNH?
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW uses HJT cells; Phono Solar PS690M13GFH-22/WNH uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW and Phono Solar PS690M13GFH-22/WNH?
Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW has a 30 years power warranty; Phono Solar PS690M13GFH-22/WNH has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW and Phono Solar PS690M13GFH-22/WNH bifacial panels?
Both Phono Solar PS725M13GFH-22/WSHW and Phono Solar PS690M13GFH-22/WNH are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 5 Phono Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.