Philadelphia Solar PS-MNB144(HCBF)-600W vs Philadelphia Solar PS-MNG144(HCBF)-600W

Philadelphia Solar
PS-MNB144(HCBF)-600W
600 Wp
23.23 %
N-type
Bifacial
VS

Philadelphia Solar
PS-MNG144(HCBF)-600W
600 Wp
23.22 %
N-type
Bifacial
The verdict
MNB144(HCBF)-600W leads on the differences that matter
The largest is weight: 5.5 kg lighter. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 3 differencesHow alike are they
16
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
3 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
MNB144(HCBF)-600W
MNG144(HCBF)-600W
Difference
Weight
27.0 kg
32.5 kg
5.5 kg lighter
Weight per kWp
45.0 kg/kWp
54.2 kg/kWp
9.2 kg/kWp lighter
Dimensions
2278x1134x30 mm
2279x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x30 mm vs 2279x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.290 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
MNB144(HCBF)-600W
20,131 kWh
MNG144(HCBF)-600W
20,131 kWh
Lifetime gap
No difference
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
MNB144(HCBF)-600W
MNG144(HCBF)-600W
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
600 W
600 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.7% of rated power
574 W
574 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.3% of rated power
548 W
548 W
Hot roof
70 °C
87.0% of rated power
522 W
522 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
MNB144(HCBF)-600W
MNG144(HCBF)-600W
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
600 Wp
600 Wp
Same
Module efficiency
23.23 %
23.22 %
Effectively the same
Power density
232.3 Wp/m²
232.2 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
52.21 V
52.18 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
44.57 V
44.58 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
14.26 A
14.25 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
13.47 A
13.46 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.290 %/°C
-0.290 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2278x1134x30 mm
2279x1134x30 mm
2278x1134x30 mm vs 2279x1134x30 mm
Module area
2.583 m²
2.584 m²
Effectively the same
Weight
27.0 kg
32.5 kg
-5.5 kg for MNB144(HCBF)-600W
Weight per kWp
45.0 kg/kWp
54.2 kg/kWp
-9.2 kg/kWp for MNB144(HCBF)-600W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
12 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
N-type
N-type
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
144
Same
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,252
vs
#1,289
MNB144(HCBF)-600W leads by 37 places
Power density
#1,252
vs
#1,332
MNB144(HCBF)-600W leads by 80 places
Heat behaviour
#2,165
vs
#2,165
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#574
vs
#8,370
MNB144(HCBF)-600W leads by 7,796 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,803
vs
#2,971
MNB144(HCBF)-600W leads by 168 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Philadelphia Solar
Philadelphia Solar PS-MNB144(HCBF)-600W vs Philadelphia Solar PS-MNB156(HCBF)-650W
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Philadelphia Solar
Philadelphia Solar PS-MNB144(HCBF)-600W vs Philadelphia Solar PS-MNB156(HCBF)-645W
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Philadelphia Solar
Philadelphia Solar PS-MNB144(HCBF)-600W vs Philadelphia Solar PS-MNB156(HCBF)-640W
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Philadelphia Solar
Philadelphia Solar PS-MNB144(HCBF)-600W vs Philadelphia Solar PS-MNB156(HCBF)-635W
10 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Philadelphia Solar
Philadelphia Solar PS-MNB144(HCBF)-600W vs Philadelphia Solar PS-MNB156(HCBF)-630W
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Philadelphia Solar
Philadelphia Solar PS-MNB144(HCBF)-600W vs Philadelphia Solar PS-MNB144(HCBF)-595W
One difference: module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Philadelphia Solar PS-MNB144(HCBF)-600W or Philadelphia Solar PS-MNG144(HCBF)-600W?
According to our database: Philadelphia Solar PS-MNB144(HCBF)-600 W has higher module efficiency (23.23% vs 23.22%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Philadelphia Solar PS-MNB144(HCBF)-600W and Philadelphia Solar PS-MNG144(HCBF)-600W?
Philadelphia Solar PS-MNB144(HCBF)-600 W has a module efficiency of 23.23%, while Philadelphia Solar PS-MNG144(HCBF)-600 W is 23.22%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Philadelphia Solar PS-MNB144(HCBF)-600W use vs Philadelphia Solar PS-MNG144(HCBF)-600W?
Philadelphia Solar PS-MNB144(HCBF)-600 W uses N-type cells; Philadelphia Solar PS-MNG144(HCBF)-600 W uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Philadelphia Solar PS-MNB144(HCBF)-600W and Philadelphia Solar PS-MNG144(HCBF)-600W?
Philadelphia Solar PS-MNB144(HCBF)-600 W has a 30 years power warranty; Philadelphia Solar PS-MNG144(HCBF)-600 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Philadelphia Solar PS-MNB144(HCBF)-600W and Philadelphia Solar PS-MNG144(HCBF)-600W bifacial panels?
Both Philadelphia Solar PS-MNB144(HCBF)-600 W and Philadelphia Solar PS-MNG144(HCBF)-600 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 6 Philadelphia Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.