Skip to main content
MS680N-DHBG vs MS710N-HJTGB 9 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG vs Mysolar USA MS710N-HJTGB

Mysolar USA
MS680N-DHBG
680 Wp 21.89 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Mysolar USA
MS710N-HJTGB
710 Wp 22.86 % HJT Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

MS710N-HJTGB leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.97 pp more efficient. 9 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
9 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

9 of 18 parameters
Parameter MS680N-DHBG MS710N-HJTGB Difference
Module efficiency 21.89 % 22.86 % 0.97 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.260 %/°C 0.040 %/°C better in heat
Power density 218.9 Wp/m² 228.6 Wp/m² 9.7 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 680 Wp 710 Wp 30 W more power
Product warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs 5 yrs longer
Open-circuit voltage 47.90 V 50.44 V 2.54 V apart
Cell technology TOPCon HJT TOPCon vs HJT
Voltage at max power 39.92 V 42.40 V 2.48 V apart
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
MS680N-DHBG
22,815 kWh
MS710N-HJTGB
23,822 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,007 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario MS680N-DHBG MS710N-HJTGB
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 680 W 710 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 649 W 682 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 619 W 655 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 588 W 627 W
03

Full specification

Parameter MS680N-DHBG MS710N-HJTGB Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 680 Wp 710 Wp +30 W for MS710N-HJTGB
Module efficiency 21.89 % 22.86 % +0.97 pp for MS710N-HJTGB
Power density 218.9 Wp/m² 228.6 Wp/m² +9.7 Wp/m² for MS710N-HJTGB
Open-circuit voltage 47.90 V 50.44 V 2.54 V apart
Voltage at max power 39.92 V 42.40 V 2.48 V apart
Short-circuit current 17.80 A 17.55 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.05 A 16.75 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.260 %/°C +0.040 %/°C for MS710N-HJTGB
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2384x1303x35 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.5 kg 38.8 kg Effectively the same
Weight per kWp 56.6 kg/kWp 54.6 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs +5 yrs for MS710N-HJTGB
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - 0.25 %/yr Not published by Mysolar USA
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon HJT TOPCon vs HJT
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#6,882 vs #2,536
MS710N-HJTGB leads by 4,346 places
Power density
#6,804 vs #2,474
MS710N-HJTGB leads by 4,330 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #511
MS710N-HJTGB leads by 5,582 places
Weight
#10,746 vs #9,026
MS710N-HJTGB leads by 1,720 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#638 vs #62
MS710N-HJTGB leads by 576 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG vs Mysolar USA MS700N-DHBG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG vs Mysolar USA MS695N-DHBG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG vs Mysolar USA MS690N-DHBG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG vs Mysolar USA MS685N-DHBG
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS710N-HJTGB vs Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS710N-HJTGB vs Mysolar USA MS715N-HJTGB
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG or Mysolar USA MS710N-HJTGB?
According to our database: Mysolar USA MS710N-HJTGB has higher module efficiency (22.86% vs 21.89%); Mysolar USA MS710N-HJTGB tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG and Mysolar USA MS710N-HJTGB?
Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG has a module efficiency of 21.89%, while Mysolar USA MS710N-HJTGB is 22.86%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG use vs Mysolar USA MS710N-HJTGB?
Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG uses TOPCon cells; Mysolar USA MS710N-HJTGB uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG and Mysolar USA MS710N-HJTGB?
Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG has a 30 years power warranty; Mysolar USA MS710N-HJTGB has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG and Mysolar USA MS710N-HJTGB bifacial panels?
Both Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG and Mysolar USA MS710N-HJTGB are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.