Skip to main content
MS680N-DHBG vs MS695N-DHBG 15 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG vs Mysolar USA MS695N-DHBG

Mysolar USA
MS680N-DHBG
680 Wp 21.89 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Mysolar USA
MS695N-DHBG
695 Wp 22.37 % TOPCon Bifacial Incomplete
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

MS695N-DHBG leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.48 pp more efficient. 15 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
15 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

3 of 18 parameters
Parameter MS680N-DHBG MS695N-DHBG Difference
Module efficiency 21.89 % 22.37 % 0.48 pp more efficient
Power density 218.9 Wp/m² 223.7 Wp/m² 4.8 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 680 Wp 695 Wp 15 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
A 1.0% first-year loss then 0.40% a year, assumed for both panels, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
MS680N-DHBG
22,815 kWh
MS695N-DHBG
23,319 kWh
Lifetime gap
504 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario MS680N-DHBG MS695N-DHBG
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 680 W 695 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 649 W 664 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 619 W 632 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 588 W 601 W
03

Full specification

Parameter MS680N-DHBG MS695N-DHBG Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 680 Wp 695 Wp +15 W for MS695N-DHBG
Module efficiency 21.89 % 22.37 % +0.48 pp for MS695N-DHBG
Power density 218.9 Wp/m² 223.7 Wp/m² +4.8 Wp/m² for MS695N-DHBG
Open-circuit voltage 47.90 V 48.62 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 39.92 V 40.52 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 17.80 A 17.93 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.05 A 17.17 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x33 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.5 kg 38.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 56.6 kg/kWp 55.4 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#6,882 vs #4,970
MS695N-DHBG leads by 1,912 places
Power density
#6,804 vs #4,877
MS695N-DHBG leads by 1,927 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#10,746 vs #9,818
MS695N-DHBG leads by 928 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#638 vs #290
MS695N-DHBG leads by 348 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG vs Mysolar USA MS700N-DHBG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG vs Mysolar USA MS690N-DHBG
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG vs Mysolar USA MS685N-DHBG
The same specification on paper
Same manufacturer
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG vs Mysolar USA MS720N-HJTGB
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG vs Mysolar USA MS715N-HJTGB
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mysolar USA
Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG vs Mysolar USA MS710N-HJTGB
9 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG or Mysolar USA MS695N-DHBG?
According to our database: Mysolar USA MS695N-DHBG has higher module efficiency (22.37% vs 21.89%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG and Mysolar USA MS695N-DHBG?
Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG has a module efficiency of 21.89%, while Mysolar USA MS695N-DHBG is 22.37%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG use vs Mysolar USA MS695N-DHBG?
Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG uses TOPCon cells; Mysolar USA MS695N-DHBG uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG and Mysolar USA MS695N-DHBG?
Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG has a 30 years power warranty; Mysolar USA MS695N-DHBG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG and Mysolar USA MS695N-DHBG bifacial panels?
Both Mysolar USA MS680N-DHBG and Mysolar USA MS695N-DHBG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.