Skip to main content
MST12660HP3G vs MSX10-445HN0B 3 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Mission Solar MST12660HP3G vs Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B

Mission Solar
MST12660HP3G
660 Wp 21.20 % PERC Bifacial
VS
Mission Solar
MSX10-445HN0B
445 Wp 22.80 % N-type
The verdict

MSX10-445HN0B leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 1.60 pp more efficient. 3 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 15 differences
How alike are they
3 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

15 of 18 parameters
Parameter MST12660HP3G MSX10-445HN0B Difference
Module efficiency 21.20 % 22.80 % 1.60 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.290 %/°C 0.050 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 660 Wp 445 Wp 215 W more power
Power density 212.5 Wp/m² 227.9 Wp/m² 15.4 Wp/m² higher
Weight 38.7 kg 21.3 kg 17.4 kg lighter
Weight per kWp 58.6 kg/kWp 47.9 kg/kWp 10.8 kg/kWp lighter
Open-circuit voltage 45.90 V 39.69 V 6.21 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.45 A 14.02 A 4.43 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 1.953 m² 1.154 m² apart
Cell technology PERC N-type PERC vs N-type
Voltage at max power 38.10 V 33.44 V 4.66 V apart
Current at max power 17.35 A 13.31 A 4.04 A apart
Cell count 132 108 24 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 1722x1134x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 1722x1134x35 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
MST12660HP3G
21,734 kWh
MSX10-445HN0B
14,814 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,920 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario MST12660HP3G MSX10-445HN0B
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 660 W 445 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 626 W 426 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 593 W 406 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 559 W 387 W
03

Full specification

Parameter MST12660HP3G MSX10-445HN0B Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 660 Wp 445 Wp +215 W for MST12660HP3G
Module efficiency 21.20 % 22.80 % +1.60 pp for MSX10-445HN0B
Power density 212.5 Wp/m² 227.9 Wp/m² +15.4 Wp/m² for MSX10-445HN0B
Open-circuit voltage 45.90 V 39.69 V 6.21 V apart
Voltage at max power 38.10 V 33.44 V 4.66 V apart
Short-circuit current 18.45 A 14.02 A 4.43 A apart
Current at max power 17.35 A 13.31 A 4.04 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.290 %/°C +0.050 %/°C for MSX10-445HN0B
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 1722x1134x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm vs 1722x1134x35 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 1.953 m² 1.154 m² apart
Weight 38.7 kg 21.3 kg -17.4 kg for MSX10-445HN0B
Weight per kWp 58.6 kg/kWp 47.9 kg/kWp -10.8 kg/kWp for MSX10-445HN0B
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty - 25 yrs Not published by Mission Solar
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.45 %/yr 0.45 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology PERC N-type PERC vs N-type
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 108 24 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#9,076 vs #2,714
MSX10-445HN0B leads by 6,362 places
Power density
#8,959 vs #2,790
MSX10-445HN0B leads by 6,169 places
Heat behaviour
#8,778 vs #2,165
MSX10-445HN0B leads by 6,613 places
Weight
#11,817 vs #1,948
MSX10-445HN0B leads by 9,869 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,651 vs #5,891
MST12660HP3G leads by 240 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MST12660HP3G vs Mission Solar MST12670HP3G
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MST12660HP3G vs Mission Solar MST12665HP3G
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B vs Mission Solar MSX10-440HN0B
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B vs Mission Solar MSX10-435HN0B
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MST12660HP3G vs Mission Solar MST12R620HN3G
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MST12660HP3G vs Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Mission Solar MST12660HP3G or Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B?
According to our database: Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B has higher module efficiency (22.80% vs 21.20%); Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.290%/°C vs -0.340%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Mission Solar MST12660HP3G and Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B?
Mission Solar MST12660HP3G has a module efficiency of 21.20%, while Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B is 22.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Mission Solar MST12660HP3G use vs Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B?
Mission Solar MST12660HP3G uses PERC cells; Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Mission Solar MST12660HP3G and Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B?
Mission Solar MST12660HP3G has a 30 years power warranty; Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Mission Solar MST12660HP3G and Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B bifacial panels?
Mission Solar MST12660HP3G is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Mission Solar MSX10-445HN0B is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 5 Mission Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.