Skip to main content
MST12660HP3G vs MST12665HP3G 17 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Mission Solar MST12660HP3G vs Mission Solar MST12665HP3G

Mission Solar
MST12660HP3G
660 Wp 21.20 % PERC Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Mission Solar
MST12665HP3G
665 Wp 21.40 % PERC Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

MST12665HP3G leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.20 pp more efficient. 17 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See the one difference
How alike are they
17 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

1 of 18 parameters
Parameter MST12660HP3G MST12665HP3G Difference
Module efficiency 21.20 % 21.40 % 0.20 pp more efficient
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.340 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
MST12660HP3G
21,734 kWh
MST12665HP3G
21,899 kWh
Lifetime gap
165 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario MST12660HP3G MST12665HP3G
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 660 W 665 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.9% of rated power 626 W 631 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.8% of rated power 593 W 597 W
Hot roof 70 °C 84.7% of rated power 559 W 563 W
03

Full specification

Parameter MST12660HP3G MST12665HP3G Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 660 Wp 665 Wp Effectively the same
Module efficiency 21.20 % 21.40 % +0.20 pp for MST12665HP3G
Power density 212.5 Wp/m² 214.1 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 45.90 V 46.10 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 38.10 V 38.30 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.45 A 18.50 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.35 A 17.39 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.340 %/°C -0.340 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.7 kg 38.7 kg Same
Weight per kWp 58.6 kg/kWp 58.2 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty - - Neither datasheet publishes this
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.45 %/yr 0.45 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology PERC PERC Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#9,145 vs #8,388
MST12665HP3G leads by 757 places
Power density
#9,028 vs #8,315
MST12665HP3G leads by 713 places
Heat behaviour
#8,846 vs #8,846
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#11,906 vs #11,709
MST12665HP3G leads by 197 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,713 vs #5,332
MST12665HP3G leads by 381 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MST12660HP3G vs Mission Solar MST12670HP3G
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MST12660HP3G vs Mission Solar MST12R620HN3G
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MST12660HP3G vs Mission Solar MST12R615HN3G
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MST12660HP3G vs Mission Solar MST12R610HN3G
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MST12660HP3G vs Mission Solar MSH10-595HN4G
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Mission Solar
Mission Solar MST12660HP3G vs Mission Solar MSI10-590HN4G
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Mission Solar MST12660HP3G or Mission Solar MST12665HP3G?
According to our database: Mission Solar MST12665HP3G has higher module efficiency (21.40% vs 21.20%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Mission Solar MST12660HP3G and Mission Solar MST12665HP3G?
Mission Solar MST12660HP3G has a module efficiency of 21.20%, while Mission Solar MST12665HP3G is 21.40%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Mission Solar MST12660HP3G use vs Mission Solar MST12665HP3G?
Mission Solar MST12660HP3G uses PERC cells; Mission Solar MST12665HP3G uses PERC. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Mission Solar MST12660HP3G and Mission Solar MST12665HP3G?
Mission Solar MST12660HP3G has a 30 years power warranty; Mission Solar MST12665HP3G has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Mission Solar MST12660HP3G and Mission Solar MST12665HP3G bifacial panels?
Both Mission Solar MST12660HP3G and Mission Solar MST12665HP3G are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 4 Mission Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.