Skip to main content
410 M/182-108+ GG vs 420 M/182-108+ GG 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Luxor Solar LX - 410 M/182-108+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX - 420 M/182-108+ GG

Luxor Solar
LX - 410 M/182-108+ GG
410 Wp 21.33 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Luxor Solar
LX - 420 M/182-108+ GG
420 Wp 21.84 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

420 M/182-108+ GG leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.51 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter 410 M/182-108+ GG 420 M/182-108+ GG Difference
Module efficiency 21.33 % 21.84 % 0.51 pp more efficient
Power density 210.0 Wp/m² 215.1 Wp/m² 5.1 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 410 Wp 420 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
410 M/182-108+ GG
13,885 kWh
420 M/182-108+ GG
14,223 kWh
Lifetime gap
338 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 410 M/182-108+ GG 420 M/182-108+ GG
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 410 W 420 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 392 W 401 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 373 W 382 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 355 W 363 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 410 M/182-108+ GG 420 M/182-108+ GG Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 410 Wp 420 Wp +10 W for 420 M/182-108+ GG
Module efficiency 21.33 % 21.84 % +0.51 pp for 420 M/182-108+ GG
Power density 210.0 Wp/m² 215.1 Wp/m² +5.1 Wp/m² for 420 M/182-108+ GG
Open-circuit voltage 37.63 V 38.09 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 31.08 V 31.46 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 13.92 A 14.09 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.20 A 13.36 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1722x1134x30 mm 1722x1134x30 mm Same
Module area 1.953 m² 1.953 m² Same
Weight 24.0 kg 24.0 kg Same
Weight per kWp 58.5 kg/kWp 57.1 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.34 %/yr 0.34 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#8,476 vs #6,985
420 M/182-108+ GG leads by 1,491 places
Power density
#9,772 vs #7,882
420 M/182-108+ GG leads by 1,890 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#11,776 vs #11,083
420 M/182-108+ GG leads by 693 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#8,162 vs #7,048
420 M/182-108+ GG leads by 1,114 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX - 410 M/182-108+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX - 430 M/182-108+ GG
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX - 410 M/182-108+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX - 425 M/182-108+ GG
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX - 410 M/182-108+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX - 415 M/182-108+ GG
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX - 410 M/182-108+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-410M/182-108+GG
The same specification on paper
Same manufacturer
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX - 410 M/182-108+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+GG
14 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same manufacturer
Luxor Solar
Luxor Solar LX - 410 M/182-108+ GG vs Luxor Solar LX-720M/210-132+ GG
15 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Luxor Solar LX - 410 M/182-108+ GG or Luxor Solar LX - 420 M/182-108+ GG?
According to our database: Luxor Solar LX - 420 M/182-108+ GG has higher module efficiency (21.84% vs 21.33%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Luxor Solar LX - 410 M/182-108+ GG and Luxor Solar LX - 420 M/182-108+ GG?
Luxor Solar LX - 410 M/182-108+ GG has a module efficiency of 21.33%, while Luxor Solar LX - 420 M/182-108+ GG is 21.84%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Luxor Solar LX - 410 M/182-108+ GG use vs Luxor Solar LX - 420 M/182-108+ GG?
Luxor Solar LX - 410 M/182-108+ GG uses TOPCon cells; Luxor Solar LX - 420 M/182-108+ GG uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Luxor Solar LX - 410 M/182-108+ GG and Luxor Solar LX - 420 M/182-108+ GG?
Luxor Solar LX - 410 M/182-108+ GG has a 30 years power warranty; Luxor Solar LX - 420 M/182-108+ GG has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Luxor Solar LX - 410 M/182-108+ GG and Luxor Solar LX - 420 M/182-108+ GG bifacial panels?
Both Luxor Solar LX - 410 M/182-108+ GG and Luxor Solar LX - 420 M/182-108+ GG are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 8 Luxor Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.