Skip to main content
LR7-54HJBB-495M vs AIKO-A485-MCE54Db 10 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M vs AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db

Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M
LR7-54HJBB-495M
495 Wp 24.30 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
485 Wp 24.30 % Back Contact
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

LR7-54HJBB-495M leads on the differences that matter

The largest is product warranty: 5 yrs longer. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
10 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

9 of 19 parameters
Parameter LR7-54HJBB-495M AIKO-A485-MCE54Db Difference
Product warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs 5 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.260 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat
Cell technology N-type Back Contact N-type vs Back Contact
Weight per kWp 47.5 kg/kWp 50.5 kg/kWp 3.0 kg/kWp lighter
Module area 2.041 m² 1.998 m² 0.043 m² apart
Rated power 495 Wp 485 Wp 10 W more power
Weight 23.5 kg 24.5 kg 1.0 kg lighter
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Dimensions 1800x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 1800x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
LR7-54HJBB-495M
16,737 kWh
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
16,399 kWh
Lifetime gap
338 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario LR7-54HJBB-495M AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 495 W 485 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.1% of rated power 477 W 466 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.2% of rated power 459 W 447 W
Hot roof 70 °C 88.3% of rated power 442 W 428 W
03

Full specification

Parameter LR7-54HJBB-495M AIKO-A485-MCE54Db Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 495 Wp 485 Wp +10 W for LR7-54HJBB-495M
Module efficiency 24.30 % 24.30 % Same
Power density 242.5 Wp/m² 242.7 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 41.35 V 40.90 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 34.17 V 34.30 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 15.15 A 14.88 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 14.49 A 14.15 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.240 %/°C -0.260 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for LR7-54HJBB-495M
Mechanical
Dimensions 1800x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm 1800x1134x30 mm vs 1762x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.041 m² 1.998 m² 0.043 m² apart
Weight 23.5 kg 24.5 kg -1.0 kg for LR7-54HJBB-495M
Weight per kWp 47.5 kg/kWp 50.5 kg/kWp -3.0 kg/kWp for LR7-54HJBB-495M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 30 yrs 25 yrs +5 yrs for LR7-54HJBB-495M
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.35 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology N-type Back Contact N-type vs Back Contact
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#145 vs #145
Tied - the same position in the database
Power density
#174 vs #155
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db leads by 19 places
Heat behaviour
#13 vs #515
LR7-54HJBB-495M leads by 502 places
Weight
#1,708 vs #3,905
LR7-54HJBB-495M leads by 2,197 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#1,830 vs #2,989
LR7-54HJBB-495M leads by 1,159 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M vs Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-505M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M vs Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-500M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M vs Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-490M
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A480-MCE54Db
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A475-MCE54Db
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A470-MCE54Db
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M or AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db?
According to our database: Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.260%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M and AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db?
Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M has a module efficiency of 24.30%, while AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db is 24.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M use vs AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db?
Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M uses N-type cells; AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db uses Back Contact. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M and AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db?
Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M has a 30 years power warranty; AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M and AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db bifacial panels?
Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Compare Longi Solar and AIKO as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 152 Longi Solar offers · See 137 AIKO offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.