Skip to main content
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs LR7-54HJBB-495M 10 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M

AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
485 Wp 24.30 % Back Contact
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M
LR7-54HJBB-495M
495 Wp 24.30 % N-type Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

LR7-54HJBB-495M leads on the differences that matter

The largest is product warranty: 5 yrs longer. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 9 differences
How alike are they
10 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

9 of 19 parameters
Parameter AIKO-A485-MCE54Db LR7-54HJBB-495M Difference
Product warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs 5 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.240 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat
Cell technology Back Contact N-type Back Contact vs N-type
Weight per kWp 50.5 kg/kWp 47.5 kg/kWp 3.0 kg/kWp lighter
Module area 1.998 m² 2.041 m² 0.043 m² apart
Rated power 485 Wp 495 Wp 10 W more power
Weight 24.5 kg 23.5 kg 1.0 kg lighter
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1800x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1800x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db
16,399 kWh
LR7-54HJBB-495M
16,737 kWh
Lifetime gap
338 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario AIKO-A485-MCE54Db LR7-54HJBB-495M
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 485 W 495 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 96.1% of rated power 466 W 477 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 92.2% of rated power 447 W 459 W
Hot roof 70 °C 88.3% of rated power 428 W 442 W
03

Full specification

Parameter AIKO-A485-MCE54Db LR7-54HJBB-495M Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 485 Wp 495 Wp +10 W for LR7-54HJBB-495M
Module efficiency 24.30 % 24.30 % Same
Power density 242.7 Wp/m² 242.5 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 40.90 V 41.35 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 34.30 V 34.17 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.88 A 15.15 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 14.15 A 14.49 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.240 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for LR7-54HJBB-495M
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1800x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1800x1134x30 mm
Module area 1.998 m² 2.041 m² 0.043 m² apart
Weight 24.5 kg 23.5 kg -1.0 kg for LR7-54HJBB-495M
Weight per kWp 50.5 kg/kWp 47.5 kg/kWp -3.0 kg/kWp for LR7-54HJBB-495M
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs +5 yrs for LR7-54HJBB-495M
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.35 %/yr 0.35 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology Back Contact N-type Back Contact vs N-type
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#145 vs #145
Tied - the same position in the database
Power density
#155 vs #174
AIKO-A485-MCE54Db leads by 19 places
Heat behaviour
#515 vs #13
LR7-54HJBB-495M leads by 502 places
Weight
#3,905 vs #1,708
LR7-54HJBB-495M leads by 2,197 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#2,989 vs #1,830
LR7-54HJBB-495M leads by 1,159 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A480-MCE54Db
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A475-MCE54Db
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A470-MCE54Db
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A465-MCE54Db
4 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db vs AIKO AIKO-A460-MCE54Db
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M vs Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-505M
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db or Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M?
According to our database: Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.240%/°C vs -0.260%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db and Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M?
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db has a module efficiency of 24.30%, while Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M is 24.30%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db use vs Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M?
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db uses Back Contact cells; Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M uses N-type. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db and Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M?
AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db has a 30 years power warranty; Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db and Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M bifacial panels?
Longi Solar LR7-54HJBB-495M is bifacial (captures light from both faces); AIKO AIKO-A485-MCE54Db is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Compare AIKO and Longi Solar as manufacturers Portfolio, efficiency, cell technologies and warranty terms

Shop prices: See 137 AIKO offers · See 152 Longi Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.