Skip to main content
M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 vs M695N66UB-SF-F7 19 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 vs LEDVANCE M695N66UB-SF-F7

LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695
LEDVANCE
M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695
695 Wp 22.37 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
LEDVANCE M695N66UB-SF-F7
LEDVANCE
M695N66UB-SF-F7
695 Wp 22.37 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

Identical on every published parameter

All 19 comparable parameters agree. Two records this alike are usually one panel sold under two names, or two bins of the same production line - decide on price and on who you would rather buy from.

How alike are they
19 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

0 of 19 parameters

Every comparable parameter agrees. The full specification is below.

02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared annual degradation, with a 1.0% first-year loss assumed for both panels because at least one datasheet omits it, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695
23,319 kWh
M695N66UB-SF-F7
23,319 kWh
Lifetime gap
No difference
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 M695N66UB-SF-F7
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 695 W 695 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 664 W 664 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 632 W 632 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 601 W 601 W
03

Full specification

Parameter M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 M695N66UB-SF-F7 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 695 Wp 695 Wp Same
Module efficiency 22.37 % 22.37 % Same
Power density 223.7 Wp/m² 223.7 Wp/m² Same
Open-circuit voltage 47.90 V 47.90 V Same
Voltage at max power 40.30 V 40.30 V Same
Short-circuit current 18.28 A 18.28 A Same
Current at max power 17.25 A 17.25 A Same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 34.5 kg 34.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 49.6 kg/kWp 49.6 kg/kWp Same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#4,970 vs #4,970
Tied - the same position in the database
Power density
#4,877 vs #4,877
Tied - the same position in the database
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#3,186 vs #3,186
Tied - the same position in the database
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#275 vs #275
Tied - the same position in the database
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
LEDVANCE
LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 vs LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-705
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
LEDVANCE
LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 vs LEDVANCE M705N66UB-SF-F7
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
LEDVANCE
LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 vs LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-700
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
LEDVANCE
LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 vs LEDVANCE M700N66UB-SF-F7
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
LEDVANCE
LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 vs LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-690
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
LEDVANCE
LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 vs LEDVANCE M690N66UB-SF-F7
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 or LEDVANCE M695N66UB-SF-F7?
According to our database: both panels are closely matched on key specs - the decision often comes down to price and local availability. See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 and LEDVANCE M695N66UB-SF-F7?
LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 has a module efficiency of 22.37%, while LEDVANCE M695N66UB-SF-F7 is 22.37%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 use vs LEDVANCE M695N66UB-SF-F7?
LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 uses TOPCon cells; LEDVANCE M695N66UB-SF-F7 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 and LEDVANCE M695N66UB-SF-F7?
LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 has a 30 years power warranty; LEDVANCE M695N66UB-SF-F7 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 and LEDVANCE M695N66UB-SF-F7 bifacial panels?
Both LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 and LEDVANCE M695N66UB-SF-F7 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 5 LEDVANCE offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.