Skip to main content
695 vs 705 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 vs LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-705

LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695
LEDVANCE
M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695
695 Wp 22.37 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-705
LEDVANCE
M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-705
705 Wp 22.70 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

705 leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.33 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter 695 705 Difference
Module efficiency 22.37 % 22.70 % 0.33 pp more efficient
Power density 223.7 Wp/m² 227.0 Wp/m² 3.2 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 695 Wp 705 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Declared annual degradation, with a 1.0% first-year loss assumed for both panels because at least one datasheet omits it, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
695
23,319 kWh
705
23,654 kWh
Lifetime gap
335 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 695 705
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 695 W 705 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 664 W 673 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 632 W 642 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 601 W 610 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 695 705 Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 695 Wp 705 Wp +10 W for 705
Module efficiency 22.37 % 22.70 % +0.33 pp for 705
Power density 223.7 Wp/m² 227.0 Wp/m² +3.2 Wp/m² for 705
Open-circuit voltage 47.90 V 48.20 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 40.30 V 40.70 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.28 A 18.36 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.25 A 17.33 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x35 mm 2384x1303x35 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 34.5 kg 34.5 kg Same
Weight per kWp 49.6 kg/kWp 48.9 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#4,970 vs #3,307
705 leads by 1,663 places
Power density
#4,877 vs #3,361
705 leads by 1,516 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#3,186 vs #2,611
705 leads by 575 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#275 vs #166
705 leads by 109 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
LEDVANCE
LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 vs LEDVANCE M705N66UB-SF-F7
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
LEDVANCE
LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 vs LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-700
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
LEDVANCE
LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 vs LEDVANCE M700N66UB-SF-F7
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
LEDVANCE
LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 vs LEDVANCE M695N66UB-SF-F7
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
LEDVANCE
LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 vs LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-690
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
LEDVANCE
LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 vs LEDVANCE M690N66UB-SF-F7
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 or LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-705?
According to our database: LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-705 has higher module efficiency (22.70% vs 22.37%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 and LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-705?
LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 has a module efficiency of 22.37%, while LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-705 is 22.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 use vs LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-705?
LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 uses TOPCon cells; LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-705 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 and LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-705?
LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 has a 30 years power warranty; LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-705 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 and LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-705 bifacial panels?
Both LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-695 and LEDVANCE M685~705N66UB-SF-F7-705 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 5 LEDVANCE offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.