Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W
VS
The verdict
LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W leads on the differences that matter
The largest is rated power: 125 W more power. 10 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 9 differencesHow alike are they
10
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
9 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W
LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W
Difference
Rated power
715 Wp
590 Wp
125 W more power
Weight per kWp
47.6 kg/kWp
54.2 kg/kWp
6.7 kg/kWp lighter
Short-circuit current
18.61 A
15.32 A
3.29 A apart
Module area
3.106 m²
2.584 m²
0.522 m² apart
Module efficiency
23.12 %
22.83 %
0.29 pp more efficient
Weight
34.0 kg
32.0 kg
2.0 kg lighter
Current at max power
17.52 A
14.49 A
3.03 A apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2279x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 2279x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W
23,990 kWh
LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W
19,796 kWh
Lifetime gap
4,194 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W
LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
715 W
590 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
683 W
563 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
651 W
537 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
618 W
510 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W
LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
715 Wp
590 Wp
+125 W for LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W
Module efficiency
23.12 %
22.83 %
+0.29 pp for LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
228.3 Wp/m²
Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage
48.80 V
48.62 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
40.80 V
40.72 V
Effectively the same
Short-circuit current
18.61 A
15.32 A
3.29 A apart
Current at max power
17.52 A
14.49 A
3.03 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
Same
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
2279x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 2279x1134x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
2.584 m²
0.522 m² apart
Weight
34.0 kg
32.0 kg
-2.0 kg for LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W
Weight per kWp
47.6 kg/kWp
54.2 kg/kWp
-6.7 kg/kWp for LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
25 yrs
25 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
132
Same
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,567
vs
#2,683
LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W leads by 1,116 places
Power density
#2,018
vs
#2,731
LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W leads by 713 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093
vs
#6,093
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#1,753
vs
#8,477
LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W leads by 6,724 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#92
vs
#1,591
LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W leads by 1,499 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-720W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-710W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-705W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-700W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-695W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W vs Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-690W
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W or Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W?
According to our database: Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715 W has higher module efficiency (23.12% vs 22.83%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W and Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W?
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715 W has a module efficiency of 23.12%, while Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590 W is 22.83%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W use vs Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W?
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715 W uses TOPCon cells; Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W and Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W?
Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715 W has a 30 years power warranty; Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715W and Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590W bifacial panels?
Leapton LP182*199-M-66-NB 590 W is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Leapton LP210*210-M-66-NH-715 W is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 8 Leapton offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.

