LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W vs LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W 9 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Leapton LP182182-M-54-NB-445W vs Leapton LP182210-M-54-NB-510W

Q: Which panel is better: Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W or Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W?

According to our database: Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W has higher module efficiency (22.93% vs 22.27%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

Q: What is the efficiency of Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W and Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W?

Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W has a module efficiency of 22.27%, while Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W is 22.93%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

Q: What cell technology does Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W use vs Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W?

Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W uses TOPCon cells; Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

Q: What is the warranty on Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W and Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W?

Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W has a 30 years power warranty; Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Q: Are Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W and Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W bifacial panels?

Both Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W and Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Leapton

LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W

445 Wp 22.27 % TOPCon Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

Leapton

LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W

510 Wp 22.93 % TOPCon Bifacial

Open panel page Datasheet PDF

The verdict

LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.66 pp more efficient. 9 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 10 differences

How alike are they

9 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical

identical differs

What actually differs

10 of 19 parameters

Parameter LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W Difference

Module efficiency 22.27 % 22.93 % 0.66 pp more efficient

Rated power 445 Wp 510 Wp 65 W more power

Power density 222.7 Wp/m² 229.3 Wp/m² 6.6 Wp/m² higher

Weight 25.0 kg 27.7 kg 2.7 kg lighter

Module area 1.998 m² 2.224 m² 0.226 m² apart

Short-circuit current 14.07 A 16.01 A 1.94 A apart

Current at max power 13.60 A 15.12 A 1.52 A apart

Open-circuit voltage 39.53 V 40.57 V 1.04 V apart

Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1961x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm

Voltage at max power 32.72 V 33.73 V 1.01 V apart

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production

Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year

Cell temperature

Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.

LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W

14,931 kWh

LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W

17,112 kWh

Lifetime gap

2,181 kWh

Output when it is hot

Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees

Scenario LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W

Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 445 W 510 W

Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 425 W 487 W

Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 405 W 464 W

Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 385 W 441 W

Full specification

Parameter LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W Difference

Power and efficiency

Rated power 445 Wp 510 Wp +65 W for LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W

Module efficiency 22.27 % 22.93 % +0.66 pp for LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W

Power density 222.7 Wp/m² 229.3 Wp/m² +6.6 Wp/m² for LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W

Open-circuit voltage 39.53 V 40.57 V 1.04 V apart

Voltage at max power 32.72 V 33.73 V 1.01 V apart

Short-circuit current 14.07 A 16.01 A 1.94 A apart

Current at max power 13.60 A 15.12 A 1.52 A apart

Temperature

Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same

Mechanical

Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1961x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm

Module area 1.998 m² 2.224 m² 0.226 m² apart

Weight 25.0 kg 27.7 kg -2.7 kg for LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W

Weight per kWp 56.2 kg/kWp 54.3 kg/kWp Effectively the same

Warranty and degradation

Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same

Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same

Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same

Technology

Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same

Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same

Cell count 108 108 Same

Bifacial Yes Yes Same

Against the whole database

14,129 panels

Efficiency

#5,544 vs #2,395

LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W leads by 3,149 places

Power density

#5,365 vs #2,397

LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W leads by 2,968 places

Heat behaviour

#6,152 vs #6,152

Tied - the same position in the database

Weight

#10,542 vs #8,655

LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W leads by 1,887 places

Warranty

#21 vs #21

Tied - the same position in the database

Overall

#6,817 vs #3,737

LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W leads by 3,080 places

More useful comparisons

Open the full database

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W vs Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-505W

8 differences, the largest is rated power

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W vs Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-500W

7 differences, the largest is rated power

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W vs Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-495W

6 differences, the largest is rated power

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W vs Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-490W

7 differences, the largest is rated power

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-450W

One difference: module efficiency

Same series, other bin

Leapton

Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-440W

One difference: module efficiency

Written summary

Checking cache...

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W or Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W?

According to our database: Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-510 W has higher module efficiency (22.93% vs 22.27%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.

What is the efficiency of Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W and Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W?

Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445 W has a module efficiency of 22.27%, while Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-510 W is 22.93%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.

What cell technology does Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W use vs Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W?

Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445 W uses TOPCon cells; Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-510 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.

What is the warranty on Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W and Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W?

Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445 W has a 30 years power warranty; Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-510 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.

Are Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W and Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W bifacial panels?

Both Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445 W and Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-510 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 9 Leapton offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.