Skip to main content
LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W vs LP182*210-M-54-NB-490W 12 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W vs Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-490W

Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W
Leapton
LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W
445 Wp 22.27 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-490W
Leapton
LP182*210-M-54-NB-490W
490 Wp 22.03 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

7 differences, and they point both ways

The largest is rated power: 45 W more power. 12 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 7 differences
How alike are they
12 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

7 of 19 parameters
Parameter LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W LP182*210-M-54-NB-490W Difference
Rated power 445 Wp 490 Wp 45 W more power
Weight 25.0 kg 27.7 kg 2.7 kg lighter
Module area 1.998 m² 2.224 m² 0.226 m² apart
Short-circuit current 14.07 A 15.78 A 1.71 A apart
Module efficiency 22.27 % 22.03 % 0.24 pp more efficient
Current at max power 13.60 A 14.88 A 1.28 A apart
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1961x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W
14,931 kWh
LP182*210-M-54-NB-490W
16,440 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,509 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W LP182*210-M-54-NB-490W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 445 W 490 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 425 W 468 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 405 W 446 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 385 W 424 W
03

Full specification

Parameter LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W LP182*210-M-54-NB-490W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 445 Wp 490 Wp +45 W for LP182*210-M-54-NB-490W
Module efficiency 22.27 % 22.03 % +0.24 pp for LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W
Power density 222.7 Wp/m² 220.3 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 39.53 V 39.57 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 32.72 V 32.93 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.07 A 15.78 A 1.71 A apart
Current at max power 13.60 A 14.88 A 1.28 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1961x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm
Module area 1.998 m² 2.224 m² 0.226 m² apart
Weight 25.0 kg 27.7 kg -2.7 kg for LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W
Weight per kWp 56.2 kg/kWp 56.5 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#5,544 vs #6,369
LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W leads by 825 places
Power density
#5,365 vs #6,339
LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W leads by 974 places
Heat behaviour
#6,152 vs #6,152
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#10,542 vs #10,791
LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W leads by 249 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,817 vs #5,492
LP182*210-M-54-NB-490W leads by 1,325 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W vs Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W vs Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-505W
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W vs Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-500W
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W vs Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-495W
6 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-450W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-440W
One difference: module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W or Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-490W?
According to our database: Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445 W has higher module efficiency (22.27% vs 22.03%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W and Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-490W?
Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445 W has a module efficiency of 22.27%, while Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-490 W is 22.03%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W use vs Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-490W?
Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445 W uses TOPCon cells; Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-490 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W and Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-490W?
Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445 W has a 30 years power warranty; Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-490 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W and Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-490W bifacial panels?
Both Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445 W and Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-490 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 9 Leapton offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.