Skip to main content
LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W vs LP182*210-M-54-NB-495W 13 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W vs Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-495W

Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W
Leapton
LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W
445 Wp 22.27 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-495W
Leapton
LP182*210-M-54-NB-495W
495 Wp 22.26 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

LP182*210-M-54-NB-495W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is rated power: 50 W more power. 13 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 6 differences
How alike are they
13 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

6 of 19 parameters
Parameter LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W LP182*210-M-54-NB-495W Difference
Rated power 445 Wp 495 Wp 50 W more power
Weight 25.0 kg 27.7 kg 2.7 kg lighter
Module area 1.998 m² 2.224 m² 0.226 m² apart
Short-circuit current 14.07 A 15.84 A 1.77 A apart
Current at max power 13.60 A 14.94 A 1.34 A apart
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1961x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.300 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W
14,931 kWh
LP182*210-M-54-NB-495W
16,608 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,677 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W LP182*210-M-54-NB-495W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 445 W 495 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.5% of rated power 425 W 473 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.0% of rated power 405 W 450 W
Hot roof 70 °C 86.5% of rated power 385 W 428 W
03

Full specification

Parameter LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W LP182*210-M-54-NB-495W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 445 Wp 495 Wp +50 W for LP182*210-M-54-NB-495W
Module efficiency 22.27 % 22.26 % Effectively the same
Power density 222.7 Wp/m² 222.6 Wp/m² Effectively the same
Open-circuit voltage 39.53 V 39.82 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 32.72 V 33.13 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 14.07 A 15.84 A 1.77 A apart
Current at max power 13.60 A 14.94 A 1.34 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.300 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 1762x1134x30 mm 1961x1134x30 mm 1762x1134x30 mm vs 1961x1134x30 mm
Module area 1.998 m² 2.224 m² 0.226 m² apart
Weight 25.0 kg 27.7 kg -2.7 kg for LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W
Weight per kWp 56.2 kg/kWp 56.0 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 25 yrs 25 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#5,544 vs #5,656
LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W leads by 112 places
Power density
#5,365 vs #5,584
LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W leads by 219 places
Heat behaviour
#6,152 vs #6,152
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#10,542 vs #10,391
LP182*210-M-54-NB-495W leads by 151 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#6,817 vs #5,078
LP182*210-M-54-NB-495W leads by 1,739 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W vs Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-510W
10 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W vs Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-505W
8 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W vs Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-500W
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W vs Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-490W
7 differences, the largest is rated power
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-450W
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Leapton
Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W vs Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-440W
One difference: module efficiency
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W or Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-495W?
According to our database: Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445 W has higher module efficiency (22.27% vs 22.26%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W and Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-495W?
Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445 W has a module efficiency of 22.27%, while Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-495 W is 22.26%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W use vs Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-495W?
Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445 W uses TOPCon cells; Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-495 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W and Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-495W?
Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445 W has a 30 years power warranty; Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-495 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445W and Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-495W bifacial panels?
Both Leapton LP182*182-M-54-NB-445 W and Leapton LP182*210-M-54-NB-495 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 9 Leapton offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.