KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) vs KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC
VS
The verdict
KPV 445Wp HC leads on the differences that matter
The largest is performance warranty: 5 yrs longer. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 11 differencesHow alike are they
8
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
11 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)
KPV 445Wp HC
Difference
Performance warranty
25 yrs
30 yrs
5 yrs longer
Annual degradation
0.70 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
0.30 %/yr slower
Product warranty
15 yrs
30 yrs
15 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.320 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
Weight per kWp
56.2 kg/kWp
50.6 kg/kWp
5.6 kg/kWp lighter
Weight
25.0 kg
22.5 kg
2.5 kg lighter
Power density
227.9 Wp/m²
222.7 Wp/m²
5.2 Wp/m² higher
Module area
1.953 m²
1.998 m²
0.045 m² apart
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
Dimensions
1722x1134x35 mm
1748x1143x35 mm
1722x1134x35 mm vs 1748x1143x35 mm
Voltage at max power
33.24 V
34.31 V
1.07 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)
13,913 kWh
KPV 445Wp HC
14,931 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,018 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)
KPV 445Wp HC
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
445 W
445 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.2% of rated power
425 W
424 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
90.4% of rated power
405 W
402 W
Hot roof
70 °C
85.6% of rated power
385 W
381 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)
KPV 445Wp HC
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
445 Wp
445 Wp
Same
Module efficiency
22.79 %
22.83 %
Effectively the same
Power density
227.9 Wp/m²
222.7 Wp/m²
+5.2 Wp/m² for KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)
Open-circuit voltage
39.45 V
39.95 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
33.24 V
34.31 V
1.07 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.10 A
13.66 A
Effectively the same
Current at max power
13.39 A
12.97 A
Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.300 %/°C
-0.320 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)
Mechanical
Dimensions
1722x1134x35 mm
1748x1143x35 mm
1722x1134x35 mm vs 1748x1143x35 mm
Module area
1.953 m²
1.998 m²
0.045 m² apart
Weight
25.0 kg
22.5 kg
-2.5 kg for KPV 445Wp HC
Weight per kWp
56.2 kg/kWp
50.6 kg/kWp
-5.6 kg/kWp for KPV 445Wp HC
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
30 yrs
+15 yrs for KPV 445Wp HC
Performance warranty
25 yrs
30 yrs
+5 yrs for KPV 445Wp HC
Annual degradation
0.70 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
-0.30 %/yr for KPV 445Wp HC
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
108
108
Same
Bifacial
Yes
No
Yes vs No
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#3,005
vs
#2,683
KPV 445Wp HC leads by 322 places
Power density
#2,790
vs
#5,300
KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) leads by 2,510 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093
vs
#8,312
KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) leads by 2,219 places
Weight
#10,457
vs
#3,950
KPV 445Wp HC leads by 6,507 places
Warranty
#9,798
vs
#21
KPV 445Wp HC leads by 9,777 places
Overall
#9,379
vs
#4,903
KPV 445Wp HC leads by 4,476 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
KIOTO Solar
KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) vs KIOTO Solar KPV 450Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)
5 differences, the largest is open-circuit voltage
Same series, other bin
KIOTO Solar
KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) vs KIOTO Solar KPV 440Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
KIOTO Solar
KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC vs KIOTO Solar KPV 450Wp HC
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
KIOTO Solar
KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC vs KIOTO Solar KPV 440 Wp HCB
One difference: module efficiency
Same manufacturer
KIOTO Solar
KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) vs KIOTO Solar KPV 450 Wp HC NE
9 differences, the largest is product warranty
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) or KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC?
According to our database: KIOTO Solar KPV 445 Wp HC has higher module efficiency (22.83% vs 22.79%); KIOTO Solar KPV 445 Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.320%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) and KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC?
KIOTO Solar KPV 445 Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) has a module efficiency of 22.79%, while KIOTO Solar KPV 445 Wp HC is 22.83%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) use vs KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC?
KIOTO Solar KPV 445 Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) uses TOPCon cells; KIOTO Solar KPV 445 Wp HC uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) and KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC?
KIOTO Solar KPV 445 Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) has a 25 years power warranty; KIOTO Solar KPV 445 Wp HC has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) and KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC bifacial panels?
KIOTO Solar KPV 445 Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) is bifacial (captures light from both faces); KIOTO Solar KPV 445 Wp HC is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 2 KIOTO Solar offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.