Skip to main content
KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) vs KPV 445Wp HC 8 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) vs KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC

KIOTO Solar
KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)
445 Wp 22.79 % TOPCon Bifacial
VS
KIOTO Solar
KPV 445Wp HC
445 Wp 22.83 % TOPCon
The verdict

KPV 445Wp HC leads on the differences that matter

The largest is performance warranty: 5 yrs longer. 8 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 11 differences
How alike are they
8 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

11 of 19 parameters
Parameter KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) KPV 445Wp HC Difference
Performance warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs 5 yrs longer
Annual degradation 0.70 %/yr 0.40 %/yr 0.30 %/yr slower
Product warranty 15 yrs 30 yrs 15 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.320 %/°C 0.020 %/°C better in heat
Weight per kWp 56.2 kg/kWp 50.6 kg/kWp 5.6 kg/kWp lighter
Weight 25.0 kg 22.5 kg 2.5 kg lighter
Power density 227.9 Wp/m² 222.7 Wp/m² 5.2 Wp/m² higher
Module area 1.953 m² 1.998 m² 0.045 m² apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Dimensions 1722x1134x35 mm 1748x1143x35 mm 1722x1134x35 mm vs 1748x1143x35 mm
Voltage at max power 33.24 V 34.31 V 1.07 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)
13,913 kWh
KPV 445Wp HC
14,931 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,018 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) KPV 445Wp HC
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 445 W 445 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.2% of rated power 425 W 424 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 90.4% of rated power 405 W 402 W
Hot roof 70 °C 85.6% of rated power 385 W 381 W
03

Full specification

Parameter KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) KPV 445Wp HC Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 445 Wp 445 Wp Same
Module efficiency 22.79 % 22.83 % Effectively the same
Power density 227.9 Wp/m² 222.7 Wp/m² +5.2 Wp/m² for KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)
Open-circuit voltage 39.45 V 39.95 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 33.24 V 34.31 V 1.07 V apart
Short-circuit current 14.10 A 13.66 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 13.39 A 12.97 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.300 %/°C -0.320 %/°C +0.020 %/°C for KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)
Mechanical
Dimensions 1722x1134x35 mm 1748x1143x35 mm 1722x1134x35 mm vs 1748x1143x35 mm
Module area 1.953 m² 1.998 m² 0.045 m² apart
Weight 25.0 kg 22.5 kg -2.5 kg for KPV 445Wp HC
Weight per kWp 56.2 kg/kWp 50.6 kg/kWp -5.6 kg/kWp for KPV 445Wp HC
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 30 yrs +15 yrs for KPV 445Wp HC
Performance warranty 25 yrs 30 yrs +5 yrs for KPV 445Wp HC
Annual degradation 0.70 %/yr 0.40 %/yr -0.30 %/yr for KPV 445Wp HC
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 108 108 Same
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#3,005 vs #2,683
KPV 445Wp HC leads by 322 places
Power density
#2,790 vs #5,300
KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) leads by 2,510 places
Heat behaviour
#6,093 vs #8,312
KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) leads by 2,219 places
Weight
#10,457 vs #3,950
KPV 445Wp HC leads by 6,507 places
Warranty
#9,798 vs #21
KPV 445Wp HC leads by 9,777 places
Overall
#9,379 vs #4,903
KPV 445Wp HC leads by 4,476 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
KIOTO Solar
KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) vs KIOTO Solar KPV 450Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)
5 differences, the largest is open-circuit voltage
Same series, other bin
KIOTO Solar
KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) vs KIOTO Solar KPV 440Wp HC NE (G/G-TC)
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
KIOTO Solar
KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC vs KIOTO Solar KPV 450Wp HC
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
KIOTO Solar
KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC vs KIOTO Solar KPV 440 Wp HCB
One difference: module efficiency
Same manufacturer
KIOTO Solar
KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) vs KIOTO Solar KPV 450 Wp HC NE
9 differences, the largest is product warranty
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) or KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC?
According to our database: KIOTO Solar KPV 445 Wp HC has higher module efficiency (22.83% vs 22.79%); KIOTO Solar KPV 445 Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.300%/°C vs -0.320%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) and KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC?
KIOTO Solar KPV 445 Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) has a module efficiency of 22.79%, while KIOTO Solar KPV 445 Wp HC is 22.83%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) use vs KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC?
KIOTO Solar KPV 445 Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) uses TOPCon cells; KIOTO Solar KPV 445 Wp HC uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) and KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC?
KIOTO Solar KPV 445 Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) has a 25 years power warranty; KIOTO Solar KPV 445 Wp HC has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) and KIOTO Solar KPV 445Wp HC bifacial panels?
KIOTO Solar KPV 445 Wp HC NE (G/G-TC) is bifacial (captures light from both faces); KIOTO Solar KPV 445 Wp HC is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 2 KIOTO Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.