Skip to main content
FCMH-710W-HD vs EBMH-560W-D 4 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Just Solar JST-FCMH-710W-HD vs Just Solar JST-EBMH-560W-D

Just Solar JST-FCMH-710W-HD
Just Solar
JST-FCMH-710W-HD
710 Wp 22.86 % HJT Bifacial
VS
Just Solar
JST-EBMH-560W-D
560 Wp 21.90 % TOPCon
The verdict

FCMH-710W-HD leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.96 pp more efficient. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 15 differences
How alike are they
4 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

15 of 19 parameters
Parameter FCMH-710W-HD EBMH-560W-D Difference
Module efficiency 22.86 % 21.90 % 0.96 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.360 %/°C 0.100 %/°C better in heat
Rated power 710 Wp 560 Wp 150 W more power
Annual degradation 0.30 %/yr 0.59 %/yr 0.29 %/yr slower
Power density 228.6 Wp/m² 216.7 Wp/m² 11.9 Wp/m² higher
Weight 38.3 kg 29.0 kg 9.3 kg lighter
Short-circuit current 17.25 A 14.10 A 3.15 A apart
Module area 3.106 m² 2.584 m² 0.522 m² apart
Cell technology HJT TOPCon HJT vs TOPCon
Current at max power 16.34 A 13.33 A 3.01 A apart
Cell count 132 144 12 cells apart
Weight per kWp 53.9 kg/kWp 51.8 kg/kWp 2.2 kg/kWp lighter
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2279x1134x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2279x1134x35 mm
Voltage at max power 43.46 V 42.00 V 1.46 V apart
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
FCMH-710W-HD
24,193 kWh
EBMH-560W-D
17,831 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,362 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario FCMH-710W-HD EBMH-560W-D
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 710 W 560 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 94.6% of rated power 682 W 530 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 89.2% of rated power 655 W 500 W
Hot roof 70 °C 83.8% of rated power 627 W 469 W
03

Full specification

Parameter FCMH-710W-HD EBMH-560W-D Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 710 Wp 560 Wp +150 W for FCMH-710W-HD
Module efficiency 22.86 % 21.90 % +0.96 pp for FCMH-710W-HD
Power density 228.6 Wp/m² 216.7 Wp/m² +11.9 Wp/m² for FCMH-710W-HD
Open-circuit voltage 50.71 V 50.20 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 43.46 V 42.00 V 1.46 V apart
Short-circuit current 17.25 A 14.10 A 3.15 A apart
Current at max power 16.34 A 13.33 A 3.01 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.260 %/°C -0.360 %/°C +0.100 %/°C for FCMH-710W-HD
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2279x1134x35 mm 2384x1303x33 mm vs 2279x1134x35 mm
Module area 3.106 m² 2.584 m² 0.522 m² apart
Weight 38.3 kg 29.0 kg -9.3 kg for EBMH-560W-D
Weight per kWp 53.9 kg/kWp 51.8 kg/kWp -2.2 kg/kWp for EBMH-560W-D
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 15 yrs 15 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.30 %/yr 0.59 %/yr -0.29 %/yr for FCMH-710W-HD
Technology
Cell technology HJT TOPCon HJT vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 144 12 cells apart
Bifacial Yes No Yes vs No
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#2,536 vs #6,783
FCMH-710W-HD leads by 4,247 places
Power density
#2,474 vs #7,538
FCMH-710W-HD leads by 5,064 places
Heat behaviour
#511 vs #12,345
FCMH-710W-HD leads by 11,834 places
Weight
#8,122 vs #5,155
EBMH-560W-D leads by 2,967 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#608 vs #5,159
FCMH-710W-HD leads by 4,551 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Just Solar
Just Solar JST-FCMH-710W-HD vs Just Solar JST-FCMH-740W-HD
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Just Solar
Just Solar JST-FCMH-710W-HD vs Just Solar JST-FCMH-735W-HD
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Just Solar
Just Solar JST-FCMH-710W-HD vs Just Solar JST-FCMH-730W-HD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Just Solar
Just Solar JST-FCMH-710W-HD vs Just Solar JST-FCMH-725W-HD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Just Solar
Just Solar JST-FCMH-710W-HD vs Just Solar JST-FCMH-720W-HD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Just Solar
Just Solar JST-FCMH-710W-HD vs Just Solar JST-FCMH-715W-HD
The same specification on paper
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Just Solar JST-FCMH-710W-HD or Just Solar JST-EBMH-560W-D?
According to our database: Just Solar JST-FCMH-710 W-HD has higher module efficiency (22.86% vs 21.90%); Just Solar JST-FCMH-710 W-HD tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.360%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Just Solar JST-FCMH-710W-HD and Just Solar JST-EBMH-560W-D?
Just Solar JST-FCMH-710 W-HD has a module efficiency of 22.86%, while Just Solar JST-EBMH-560 W-D is 21.90%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Just Solar JST-FCMH-710W-HD use vs Just Solar JST-EBMH-560W-D?
Just Solar JST-FCMH-710 W-HD uses HJT cells; Just Solar JST-EBMH-560 W-D uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Just Solar JST-FCMH-710W-HD and Just Solar JST-EBMH-560W-D?
Just Solar JST-FCMH-710 W-HD has a 30 years power warranty; Just Solar JST-EBMH-560 W-D has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Just Solar JST-FCMH-710W-HD and Just Solar JST-EBMH-560W-D bifacial panels?
Just Solar JST-FCMH-710 W-HD is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Just Solar JST-EBMH-560 W-D is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 1 Just Solar offer

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.