Just Solar JST-EBMH-560W-D vs Just Solar JST-FCMH-710W-HD
VS
The verdict
FCMH-710W-HD leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.96 pp more efficient. 4 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 15 differencesHow alike are they
4
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
15 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
EBMH-560W-D
FCMH-710W-HD
Difference
Module efficiency
21.90 %
22.86 %
0.96 pp more efficient
Temperature coefficient
-0.360 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
0.100 %/°C better in heat
Rated power
560 Wp
710 Wp
150 W more power
Annual degradation
0.59 %/yr
0.30 %/yr
0.29 %/yr slower
Power density
216.7 Wp/m²
228.6 Wp/m²
11.9 Wp/m² higher
Weight
29.0 kg
38.3 kg
9.3 kg lighter
Short-circuit current
14.10 A
17.25 A
3.15 A apart
Module area
2.584 m²
3.106 m²
0.522 m² apart
Cell technology
TOPCon
HJT
TOPCon vs HJT
Current at max power
13.33 A
16.34 A
3.01 A apart
Cell count
144
132
12 cells apart
Weight per kWp
51.8 kg/kWp
53.9 kg/kWp
2.2 kg/kWp lighter
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
Dimensions
2279x1134x35 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2279x1134x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Voltage at max power
42.00 V
43.46 V
1.46 V apart
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
EBMH-560W-D
17,831 kWh
FCMH-710W-HD
24,193 kWh
Lifetime gap
6,362 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
EBMH-560W-D
FCMH-710W-HD
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
560 W
710 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
94.6% of rated power
530 W
682 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
89.2% of rated power
500 W
655 W
Hot roof
70 °C
83.8% of rated power
469 W
627 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
EBMH-560W-D
FCMH-710W-HD
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
560 Wp
710 Wp
+150 W for FCMH-710W-HD
Module efficiency
21.90 %
22.86 %
+0.96 pp for FCMH-710W-HD
Power density
216.7 Wp/m²
228.6 Wp/m²
+11.9 Wp/m² for FCMH-710W-HD
Open-circuit voltage
50.20 V
50.71 V
Effectively the same
Voltage at max power
42.00 V
43.46 V
1.46 V apart
Short-circuit current
14.10 A
17.25 A
3.15 A apart
Current at max power
13.33 A
16.34 A
3.01 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.360 %/°C
-0.260 %/°C
+0.100 %/°C for FCMH-710W-HD
Mechanical
Dimensions
2279x1134x35 mm
2384x1303x33 mm
2279x1134x35 mm vs 2384x1303x33 mm
Module area
2.584 m²
3.106 m²
0.522 m² apart
Weight
29.0 kg
38.3 kg
-9.3 kg for EBMH-560W-D
Weight per kWp
51.8 kg/kWp
53.9 kg/kWp
-2.2 kg/kWp for EBMH-560W-D
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
15 yrs
15 yrs
Same
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.59 %/yr
0.30 %/yr
-0.29 %/yr for FCMH-710W-HD
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
HJT
TOPCon vs HJT
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
144
132
12 cells apart
Bifacial
No
Yes
No vs Yes
04
14,005 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#6,783
vs
#2,536
FCMH-710W-HD leads by 4,247 places
Power density
#7,538
vs
#2,474
FCMH-710W-HD leads by 5,064 places
Heat behaviour
#12,345
vs
#511
FCMH-710W-HD leads by 11,834 places
Weight
#5,155
vs
#8,122
EBMH-560W-D leads by 2,967 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#5,159
vs
#608
FCMH-710W-HD leads by 4,551 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Just Solar
Just Solar JST-EBMH-560W-D vs Just Solar JST-EBMH-555W-D
One difference: module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Just Solar
Just Solar JST-FCMH-710W-HD vs Just Solar JST-FCMH-740W-HD
6 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Just Solar
Just Solar JST-FCMH-710W-HD vs Just Solar JST-FCMH-735W-HD
5 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Just Solar
Just Solar JST-FCMH-710W-HD vs Just Solar JST-FCMH-730W-HD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Just Solar
Just Solar JST-FCMH-710W-HD vs Just Solar JST-FCMH-725W-HD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Just Solar
Just Solar JST-FCMH-710W-HD vs Just Solar JST-FCMH-720W-HD
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Just Solar JST-EBMH-560W-D or Just Solar JST-FCMH-710W-HD?
According to our database: Just Solar JST-FCMH-710 W-HD has higher module efficiency (22.86% vs 21.90%); Just Solar JST-FCMH-710 W-HD tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.360%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Just Solar JST-EBMH-560W-D and Just Solar JST-FCMH-710W-HD?
Just Solar JST-EBMH-560 W-D has a module efficiency of 21.90%, while Just Solar JST-FCMH-710 W-HD is 22.86%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Just Solar JST-EBMH-560W-D use vs Just Solar JST-FCMH-710W-HD?
Just Solar JST-EBMH-560 W-D uses TOPCon cells; Just Solar JST-FCMH-710 W-HD uses HJT. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Just Solar JST-EBMH-560W-D and Just Solar JST-FCMH-710W-HD?
Just Solar JST-EBMH-560 W-D has a 30 years power warranty; Just Solar JST-FCMH-710 W-HD has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Just Solar JST-EBMH-560W-D and Just Solar JST-FCMH-710W-HD bifacial panels?
Just Solar JST-FCMH-710 W-HD is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Just Solar JST-EBMH-560 W-D is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.
Shop prices: See 1 Just Solar offer
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.