Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-430
VS
The verdict
HD132N-715W leads on the differences that matter
The largest is module efficiency: 0.98 pp more efficient. 5 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.
See all 14 differencesHow alike are they
5
of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
parameters are identical
identical
differs
01
14 of 19 parameters
What actually differs
Parameter
HD132N-715W
HD108N-430
Difference
Module efficiency
23.00 %
22.02 %
0.98 pp more efficient
Rated power
715 Wp
430 Wp
285 W more power
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
220.2 Wp/m²
10.0 Wp/m² higher
Weight
38.1 kg
24.5 kg
13.6 kg lighter
Product warranty
12 yrs
25 yrs
13 yrs longer
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
0.020 %/°C better in heat
Open-circuit voltage
48.14 V
38.30 V
9.84 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.28 A
14.12 A
4.16 A apart
Module area
3.106 m²
1.953 m²
1.154 m² apart
Weight per kWp
53.3 kg/kWp
57.0 kg/kWp
3.7 kg/kWp lighter
Voltage at max power
41.32 V
32.30 V
9.02 V apart
Current at max power
17.30 A
13.32 A
3.98 A apart
Cell count
132
108
24 cells apart
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1722x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
02
What it means on a roof
Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
HD132N-715W
23,990 kWh
HD108N-430
14,427 kWh
Lifetime gap
9,563 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario
HD132N-715W
HD108N-430
Standard test conditions
25 °C
100.0% of rated power
715 W
430 W
Cool, bright day
40 °C
95.5% of rated power
685 W
411 W
Typical summer roof
55 °C
91.0% of rated power
655 W
391 W
Hot roof
70 °C
86.5% of rated power
625 W
372 W
03
Full specification
Parameter
HD132N-715W
HD108N-430
Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power
715 Wp
430 Wp
+285 W for HD132N-715W
Module efficiency
23.00 %
22.02 %
+0.98 pp for HD132N-715W
Power density
230.2 Wp/m²
220.2 Wp/m²
+10.0 Wp/m² for HD132N-715W
Open-circuit voltage
48.14 V
38.30 V
9.84 V apart
Voltage at max power
41.32 V
32.30 V
9.02 V apart
Short-circuit current
18.28 A
14.12 A
4.16 A apart
Current at max power
17.30 A
13.32 A
3.98 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient
-0.280 %/°C
-0.300 %/°C
+0.020 %/°C for HD132N-715W
Mechanical
Dimensions
2384x1303x33 mm
1722x1134x30 mm
2384x1303x33 mm vs 1722x1134x30 mm
Module area
3.106 m²
1.953 m²
1.154 m² apart
Weight
38.1 kg
24.5 kg
-13.6 kg for HD108N-430
Weight per kWp
53.3 kg/kWp
57.0 kg/kWp
-3.7 kg/kWp for HD132N-715W
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty
12 yrs
25 yrs
+13 yrs for HD108N-430
Performance warranty
30 yrs
30 yrs
Same
Annual degradation
0.40 %/yr
0.40 %/yr
Same
Technology
Cell technology
TOPCon
TOPCon
Same
Cell type
Monocrystalline
Monocrystalline
Same
Cell count
132
108
24 cells apart
Bifacial
Yes
Yes
Same
04
14,129 panels
Against the whole database
Efficiency
#1,970
vs
#6,392
HD132N-715W leads by 4,422 places
Power density
#2,070
vs
#6,544
HD132N-715W leads by 4,474 places
Heat behaviour
#1,347
vs
#6,152
HD132N-715W leads by 4,805 places
Weight
#7,237
vs
#11,050
HD132N-715W leads by 3,813 places
Warranty
#21
vs
#21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#691
vs
#7,706
HD132N-715W leads by 7,015 places
05
Open the full database
More useful comparisons
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-710W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-710
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-705W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-705
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-700
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06
Written summary
Checking cache...
07
Questions about this pairing
Which panel is better: Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W or Jolywood JW-HD108N-430?
According to our database: Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 W has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 22.02%); Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 W tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.280%/°C vs -0.300%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W and Jolywood JW-HD108N-430?
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 W has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while Jolywood JW-HD108N-430 is 22.02%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W use vs Jolywood JW-HD108N-430?
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 W uses TOPCon cells; Jolywood JW-HD108N-430 uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W and Jolywood JW-HD108N-430?
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 W has a 30 years power warranty; Jolywood JW-HD108N-430 has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W and Jolywood JW-HD108N-430 bifacial panels?
Both Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 W and Jolywood JW-HD108N-430 are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.
Shop prices: See 24 Jolywood offers
Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.