Skip to main content
715W vs 705W 16 of 19 identical Swap Change panels

Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-705W

Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W
Jolywood
JW-HD132N-715W
715 Wp 23.00 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
VS
Jolywood JW-HD132N-705W
Jolywood
JW-HD132N-705W
705 Wp 22.70 % TOPCon Bifacial
Open panel page Datasheet PDF
The verdict

715W leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 0.30 pp more efficient. 16 of 19 comparable parameters are identical.

See all 3 differences
How alike are they
16 of 19 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs
01

What actually differs

3 of 19 parameters
Parameter 715W 705W Difference
Module efficiency 23.00 % 22.70 % 0.30 pp more efficient
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 227.0 Wp/m² 3.2 Wp/m² higher
Rated power 715 Wp 705 Wp 10 W more power
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
Same temp coeff. for both panels (-0.280 %/°C), so a warmer roof scales both curves by the same factor: the totals fall together and neither panel gains on the other.
715W
23,990 kWh
705W
23,654 kWh
Lifetime gap
336 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario 715W 705W
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 715 W 705 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.8% of rated power 685 W 675 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.6% of rated power 655 W 646 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.4% of rated power 625 W 616 W
03

Full specification

Parameter 715W 705W Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 715 Wp 705 Wp +10 W for 715W
Module efficiency 23.00 % 22.70 % +0.30 pp for 715W
Power density 230.2 Wp/m² 227.0 Wp/m² +3.2 Wp/m² for 715W
Open-circuit voltage 48.14 V 47.78 V Effectively the same
Voltage at max power 41.32 V 41.00 V Effectively the same
Short-circuit current 18.28 A 18.20 A Effectively the same
Current at max power 17.30 A 17.20 A Effectively the same
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.280 %/°C -0.280 %/°C Same
Mechanical
Dimensions 2384x1303x33 mm 2384x1303x33 mm Same
Module area 3.106 m² 3.106 m² Same
Weight 38.1 kg 38.1 kg Same
Weight per kWp 53.3 kg/kWp 54.0 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.40 %/yr Same
Technology
Cell technology TOPCon TOPCon Same
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 132 132 Same
Bifacial Yes Yes Same
04

Against the whole database

14,005 panels
Efficiency
#1,919 vs #3,307
715W leads by 1,388 places
Power density
#2,018 vs #3,361
715W leads by 1,343 places
Heat behaviour
#1,309 vs #1,309
Tied - the same position in the database
Weight
#7,172 vs #8,262
715W leads by 1,090 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#678 vs #1,007
715W leads by 329 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-715
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-710W
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-710
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-705
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-700
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jolywood
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-700W
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
06

Written summary

07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W or Jolywood JW-HD132N-705W?
According to our database: Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 W has higher module efficiency (23.00% vs 22.70%). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W and Jolywood JW-HD132N-705W?
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 W has a module efficiency of 23.00%, while Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 W is 22.70%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W use vs Jolywood JW-HD132N-705W?
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 W uses TOPCon cells; Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 W uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W and Jolywood JW-HD132N-705W?
Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 W has a 30 years power warranty; Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 W has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jolywood JW-HD132N-715W and Jolywood JW-HD132N-705W bifacial panels?
Both Jolywood JW-HD132N-715 W and Jolywood JW-HD132N-705 W are bifacial - they capture reflected light from the ground, which can add 5-15% more annual energy on ground-mount or elevated rooftop installations with a light surface beneath.

Shop prices: See 42 Jolywood offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.