Skip to main content
JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (620W variant) vs JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) 4 of 18 identical Swap Change panels

Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (620W variant) vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class)

JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (620W variant)
620 Wp 22.18 % N-type
VS
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class)
JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class)
670 Wp 24.80 % TOPCon Bifacial
The verdict

JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) leads on the differences that matter

The largest is module efficiency: 2.62 pp more efficient. 4 of 18 comparable parameters are identical, with 1 more left out because at least one datasheet does not publish it.

See all 14 differences
How alike are they
4 of 18 comparable
parameters are identical
identical differs not published
01

What actually differs

14 of 18 parameters
Parameter JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (620W variant) JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) Difference
Module efficiency 22.18 % 24.80 % 2.62 pp more efficient
Rated power 620 Wp 670 Wp 50 W more power
Power density 221.8 Wp/m² 248.0 Wp/m² 26.2 Wp/m² higher
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.260 %/°C 0.030 %/°C better in heat
Weight 29.5 kg 32.5 kg 3.0 kg lighter
Open-circuit voltage 56.40 V 50.98 V 5.42 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.86 A 16.22 A 2.36 A apart
Module area 2.795 m² 2.701 m² 0.094 m² apart
Cell technology N-type TOPCon N-type vs TOPCon
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.35 %/yr 0.05 %/yr slower
Current at max power 13.20 A 15.55 A 2.35 A apart
Voltage at max power 46.97 V 43.09 V 3.88 V apart
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
Dimensions 2465x1134x35 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 2465x1134x35 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
02

What it means on a roof

Thirty years of production
Each panel's own declared degradation curve, at 1,200 kWh/kWp a year
JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (620W variant)
20,802 kWh
JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class)
22,655 kWh
Lifetime gap
1,853 kWh
Output when it is hot
Rated power carried across the range a module actually sees
Scenario JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (620W variant) JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class)
Standard test conditions 25 °C 100.0% of rated power 620 W 670 W
Cool, bright day 40 °C 95.7% of rated power 593 W 644 W
Typical summer roof 55 °C 91.3% of rated power 566 W 618 W
Hot roof 70 °C 87.0% of rated power 539 W 592 W
03

Full specification

Parameter JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (620W variant) JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) Difference
Power and efficiency
Rated power 620 Wp 670 Wp +50 W for JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class)
Module efficiency 22.18 % 24.80 % +2.62 pp for JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class)
Power density 221.8 Wp/m² 248.0 Wp/m² +26.2 Wp/m² for JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class)
Open-circuit voltage 56.40 V 50.98 V 5.42 V apart
Voltage at max power 46.97 V 43.09 V 3.88 V apart
Short-circuit current 13.86 A 16.22 A 2.36 A apart
Current at max power 13.20 A 15.55 A 2.35 A apart
Temperature
Temperature coefficient -0.290 %/°C -0.260 %/°C +0.030 %/°C for JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class)
Mechanical
Dimensions 2465x1134x35 mm 2382x1134x30 mm 2465x1134x35 mm vs 2382x1134x30 mm
Module area 2.795 m² 2.701 m² 0.094 m² apart
Weight 29.5 kg 32.5 kg -3.0 kg for JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (620W variant)
Weight per kWp 47.6 kg/kWp 48.5 kg/kWp Effectively the same
Warranty and degradation
Product warranty 12 yrs 12 yrs Same
Performance warranty 30 yrs 30 yrs Same
Annual degradation 0.40 %/yr 0.35 %/yr -0.05 %/yr for JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class)
Technology
Cell technology N-type TOPCon N-type vs TOPCon
Cell type Monocrystalline Monocrystalline Same
Cell count 156 - Not published by Jinko Solar
Bifacial No Yes No vs Yes
04

Against the whole database

14,129 panels
Efficiency
#5,994 vs #13
JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) leads by 5,981 places
Power density
#5,933 vs #15
JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) leads by 5,918 places
Heat behaviour
#2,220 vs #515
JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) leads by 1,705 places
Weight
#1,762 vs #2,326
JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (620W variant) leads by 564 places
Warranty
#21 vs #21
Tied - the same position in the database
Overall
#3,410 vs #493
JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) leads by 2,917 places
05

More useful comparisons

Open the full database
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (620W variant) vs Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (635W variant)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (620W variant) vs Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (630W variant)
3 differences, the largest is module efficiency
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (620W variant) vs Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (625W variant)
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (620W variant) vs Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (615W variant)
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV-F2-EU (670W)
The same specification on paper
Same series, other bin
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) vs Jinko Solar JKM645-670N-66QL6-BDV-L
One difference: cell technology
06

Written summary

Checking cache...
07

Questions about this pairing

Which panel is better: Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (620W variant) or Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class)?
According to our database: Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670 W class) has higher module efficiency (24.80% vs 22.18%); Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670 W class) tolerates heat better (temp coeff -0.260%/°C vs -0.290%/°C). See the full spec comparison and 30-year energy simulation above for a complete picture.
What is the efficiency of Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (620W variant) and Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class)?
Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (620 W variant) has a module efficiency of 22.18%, while Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670 W class) is 24.80%. Higher efficiency means more electricity from the same roof area - useful when space is limited.
What cell technology does Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (620W variant) use vs Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class)?
Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (620 W variant) uses N-type cells; Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670 W class) uses TOPCon. Modern n-type technologies (TOPCon, HJT, BC) typically deliver higher efficiency and lower degradation compared to older PERC (p-type) cells.
What is the warranty on Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (620W variant) and Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class)?
Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (620 W variant) has a 30 years power warranty; Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670 W class) has a 30 years power warranty. The power warranty guarantees a minimum percentage of rated output at the end of the warranty period (typically 80-87%). Product (materials) warranties are usually shorter.
Are Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (620W variant) and Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670W class) bifacial panels?
Jinko Solar JKM650-670N-66QL6-BDV (670 W class) is bifacial (captures light from both faces); Jinko Solar JKM615-635N-78HL4-(V)-F6-EN (620 W variant) is monofacial. Bifacial panels work best on ground mounts or raised structures with a light-coloured surface underneath.

Shop prices: See 139 Jinko Solar offers

Every figure here is from the manufacturers' own datasheets - a dash means the value is not published, never an estimate. The thirty-year projection and the temperature scenarios are calculations from those figures, and each states its assumption above.